AOL outages and service status in Glen Allen, Virginia
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
- AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Glen Allen, including 0 direct reports.
AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Glen Allen, Virginia
The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Glen Allen, Virginia and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
AOL Issues Reports Near Glen Allen, Virginia
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Glen Allen and nearby locations:
-
JeyJohnson akaStinel (@JjGoodTimez) reported from Laurel Village, Virginia@AOLSupportHelp 🙄🙄🙄 I can pass any verification you throw at me ! Y’all not trying to help me. I need this email address back! Don’t worry about it... my lawyer will be in contact soon enough.
-
Muva Myra 💋 (@_MyraX) reported from Dumbarton, VirginiaBye , I couldn’t get past them asking about AOL . Oh my ****
AOL Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Jason Coy (@CoyJason58232) reported@AbakpaJob You're right. AOL gave me access for free for a decade. Phone company didn't charge for the call or extra line. I never had a pop-up ad trying to sell me anything. DARPA didnt pay one government contractor.
-
Merica (@Niggerlogic) reported@MapQuest Who ******** even know your app exists anymore If you needed to show how ******* retarded your company is You just did it You were forgotten around the AOL timeline ******* obsolescent retards
-
Miss EsqHire (@MissEsqHire) reportedClaude v Harvey: My candidate at a small, no-name firm is about to turn down an offer from an international law firm because they use Harvey and his current firm uses Claude. Apparently he cannot live without Claude. Can someone explain this to me like I’m my mom in the ’90s discovering AOL?
-
Rich (@RichardWyl39256) reported@SeaeyesTri I remember setting up my dial up connection on AOL. It was so slow back then
-
Jack_of_Trades (@diamond_r_cap) reported@nmlinguaphile mapquest! The Hammacher Schlemmer of online maps and connectivity! Are they still accepting 1,000 hours free dial up cdrom from AOL? If I were in corporate meeting: Should we do this? Me: Nobody gives a ****. Do what you want. Let's ignore them so they can die in peace.
-
Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reportedAOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.
-
AlexB (@tb_can) reportedI was a senior in highschool and was talking to a girl a year younger than me. One time she spent the night and I turned my computer on and hacked the company her dad owned. I found her dad's signature in the payroll files and pointed it out to her. You could tell she was uneasy about it but fascinated at the same time. By the time I graduated I had received three letters from AOL asking me not to hack their ****.
-
C (@T00tbeer) reported@WayneGunter8 @FrankenDjo Hahahaha oh ****. I forgot about AIM and AOL.
-
LKA (@katiwa_4) reportedSomeone decided the Adams Arcade lights are not working… with Ngong road matatus flying like they have no breaks … Aol yawa.
-
Just an old Marine (@needtobuild) reported@theikigaiguy @amazon Yep, same thing day after day. And history will repeat. A company thinks it’s infallible, but lose one customer here another there. And it adds up. Before long they become Sears, Kmart and AOL. IMO; They will end up splitting shopping and prime off eventually.