AOL outages and service status in Burlington, New Jersey

Problems in the last 24 hours in Burlington, New Jersey

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Burlington, New Jersey and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Live Outage Map Near Burlington, New Jersey

The most recent AOL outage reports came from the following cities: Bristol, and Mount Holly.

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Bristol	E-mail	1 month ago
Mount Holly	E-mail	1 month ago
Florence	E-mail	4 months ago
Levittown	E-mail	6 months ago
Levittown	E-mail	6 months ago
Burlington	Internet	6 months ago

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Dan Dilligas (@dilligas4495) reported 4 minutes ago

  @honeymoon250 17. I never had an AOL address, a Walkman, or a Waterbed.

• 
  julez • missing txt 🩷🇵🇸 (@yawnzziangel) reported 6 minutes ago

  @AbakpaJob and i’ll never buy for storage bc it used to be free. i’ll make hundreds of gmails, outlooks, yahoo, idk aol emails before i buy storage for emails

• 
  Kite Lake Studio (@KiteLakeStudio) reported 8 minutes ago

  @Based_SpaceGoji Fun fact from the prehistory of the web: In the summer of 1993, when this movie came out, there were no web browsers. (Using AOL was nothing like surfing the web a few years later.) So there was no easy way to go online and look something up, and resolve a disagreement. For example... I knew at least two kids at my high school who were SURE those were pterodactyls flying away at the end. I was like, "Dude, they were pelicans. Why would the heroes be calmly watching and smiling at dinosaurs escaping the f---ing island?" But there was no way to convince them. No way to just go on a website and look it up, and show them. The fact is, before everyone had easy access to the web, life was full of really stupid little disagreements like that, especially when you were a kid. Did the kid from the Life Cereal commercials die from eating pop-rocks with Coke? Did Alfonso Ribeiro break his neck doing a headspin? For me, at least, those pelicans at the end of Jurassic Park were the last example of that particular kind of stupid argument. A year later, Netscape launched. One more thing... I always wondered if Spielberg heard stories of people mistaking those pelicans for pterodactyls, and was annoyed by it. Especially when I saw the sequel, and it ends with what is very, very clearly a pterodactyl spreading its wings in the sunlight. As if Spielberg was saying, "Here, dumbasses, THAT's a pterodactyl."

• 
  Respectful Witness (@pauly1UP) reported 10 minutes ago

  @WrestleFeatures Millions watched Russo’s “100 horrible ideas” and kept coming back. His garbage retained an audience despite AOL TW's funding issues and lack of support. Triple H has TKO, streaming partners, and every advantage 💰, yet even hardcores say the show is DYING. No accountability here

• 
  Damen Jackson (@JacksonDamen) reported 12 minutes ago

  @honeymoon250 19. Damn AOL.

• 
  Inside Agitator (@AbsolutelyMalc1) reported 14 minutes ago

  @spencerpratt you don't know **** about business, Hollywood, or history. you're comparing apples and oranges. ALL the guilds oppose the merger. WHY IS THAT? mergers mean less projects, less competition, lower wages (and you somehow missed AOL acquiring Time Warner (and WB) in 2000

• 
  Marianne Bailey (@Mariann32594492) reported 16 minutes ago

  @honeymoon250 18. I never had an AOL address and never used a waterbed, although my brother had one for many years.

• 
  Mayank Agrawal (@mayankagrawal) reported 18 minutes ago

  Should we need to pay for email? In 2006, AOL and Yahoo announced priority delivery for senders willing to pay somewhere around a penny per message, with the promise that those messages would bypass the spam filter. The diagnosis behind it was correct. Email often breaks because sending is free, and when volume costs nothing, volume becomes the strategy (hello AI outbound!). Everything built afterward (filters, blocklists, sender reputation scores) is an attempt to patch a problem that is fundamentally about economics, and not about technology. Today, the same dynamic plays out on a much larger surface. AI agents can complete forms, take surveys, open accounts, and browse sites at a scale that would have been unimaginable for a spam operation twenty years ago, and most of that activity still registers in company dashboards as ordinary human demand. What I find most encouraging about Proof of Human is that this doesn't require the previous tradeoff. There's no toll, no puzzle, and nothing for a genuine visitor to notice or solve, because verification runs continuously in the background across the whole session rather than at a single checkpoint. When a decision does get made, there's a record behind it that a team can actually inspect, rather than an opaque score they're asked to trust. The email industry spent two decades learning that you can't tax your way to trust, and that authentication works better than obstruction. That lesson is worth carrying into whatever comes next.

• 
  Cookie Roof 🍪 (@10MinDQ) reported 19 minutes ago

  @CoachRobynRab @txsinatrafan When my email at work goes crazy I love telling the IT guy....you know I do not have issues with my home AOL.

• 
  JJ Wilson (@JJWilso51462551) reported 19 minutes ago

  @honeymoon250 19 never had AOL