AOL outages and service status in Nutley, New Jersey

Problems in the last 24 hours in Nutley, New Jersey

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Nutley, New Jersey and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Nutley, New Jersey

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Nutley and nearby locations:

• 
  cool choppers embasy🥄 (@WithChanceof) reported 18 minutes ago from Rutherford, New Jersey

  It was around the time of cosm mine and transmutable related credibility at full proliferatory two years ago that I made my biggest display of the **** scene of the aol message boards as evident by the new trak polyphonic and lock chains dynamic and that it was mutability

• 
  Matthew Weaver (@mattheweaver) reported 42 minutes ago from Montclair, New Jersey

  @cvspharmacy you have the ability to make 2020 less awful, get rid of the car-length long receipts. We all have email, even “Karen” has @aol #cvsreceipts

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Jay $ick (@JaySick78) reported 5 minutes ago

  @brockpierson Damn, I forgot those days... and forget trying to download a pic from AOL online to see who you are talking to. A/S/L

• 
  Kathleen Lenkeit voted for Hillary, Joe, & Kamala (@KathleenLenkeit) reported 12 minutes ago

  @Sheldon_305 19 - never on AOL

• 
  Steven Harris 💹🧲🇬🇱🇩🇰🇺🇦 (@steev5ten) reported 13 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh never had AOL

• 
  MADr0591 (@MADr0591) reported 13 minutes ago

  @The_FJC Two of those I never heard. AOL dial-up

• 
  Kathleen Lenkeit voted for Hillary, Joe, & Kamala (@KathleenLenkeit) reported 13 minutes ago

  @Weatherman1616 19. I’ve never had an AOL address or used AOL at all.

• 
  Fundamentals 🎲 🟥 (@Fundamentals21m) reported 15 minutes ago

  @boomer_btc @CitadelDaniel I had a joke that Primal was the AOL of Nostr but looking back it didn’t cause the network effect that AOL did. Both were UX quantum leaps -the internet was ready for it. Nostr not so much.

• 
  Roger Douglas Ware (@RDWareEsqu1re) reported 22 minutes ago

  @mariza_hofer Desperate people, don't **** with them. They can't be predicted in any meaningful fashion. Imo. I was tech support for the world's first chat based communities. AOL and Prodigy and V.B.B.S. I can say this I got catfished once, and a 17 year relationship was the results. Favour of god to your unity with an equal and opposite force. My dignity is all that keeps me from flirtatious decorum. Will be looking for someone of quality to refer to you for inspection.

• 
  KingStudebaker (@KingStudebaker) reported 23 minutes ago

  @MapQuest Lol. People use this ap??? Let me get my old AOL account and login

• 
  Roger Baker (@RogerBa18178307) reported 24 minutes ago

  @Anu_Start__ This graphic is crap - still has AOL on it. If this is where companies started there are dozens of errors.

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 25 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.