1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. AOL
  4. Irvine
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Irvine, California

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Irvine, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Irvine, California

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Irvine, California and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Irvine, California

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Irvine and nearby locations:

  • AG_Cvetas
    A Green G-Shep 🌴🐾🐕💚 (@AG_Cvetas) reported from Costa Mesa, California

    @jpawgmafia AOL dial up with the blue sign in box.

  • Dradelovesmusic
    KIRKLAND J BALVIN (@Dradelovesmusic) reported from Santa Ana, California

    Nelly got AOL dialup, this shit really is a throwback gotdamn

  • kikifbaby12
    Kirian Chin (@kikifbaby12) reported from Newport Beach, California

    This woman complains about how slow her internet is cause her email never loads EVERY. SINGLE. DAY.. she uses AOL. It’s not the internet.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • flowidealism
    Michael Strong (@flowidealism) reported

    I remember being excited by Google and its clean interface and effective search as compared to Yahoo and AOL around 1999. It has become absolute garbage.

  • xdamman
    Xavier Damman 🌍🔅 (@xdamman) reported

    Wow surprisingly tone deaf post from an @openai top executive. Feels like AOL or Compuserve arguing about how dangerous and bad for innovation an open internet would be. Permissionless innovation. That’s what open weight models offer.

  • MJ8675309JM
    MJ (@MJ8675309JM) reported

    @Barbara0699 @theliamnissan I’m almost embarrassed to say that I still use an AOL account for shopping, etc. I get enough free stuff from them to make it worthwhile, and they’re great at filtering out the garbage.

  • TFroehlig
    Tim Froehlig (@TFroehlig) reported

    AOL, sit your sorry behinds down. OG, baby.

  • jonthebirdman
    Birdman Jon (@jonthebirdman) reported

    @d4doome Usenet was good until infiltrated & destroyed by spam. Unfiltered Usenet groups have no modern equivalent. X shadow bans & stifles, even under Elon. Facebook is horrid. But before I used Usenet I was banned from AOL forums. The original evil, from which sh*t sites like Facebook & Reddit are censorious de facto children. Also I caused these three groups to be created, in the day, when most anyone could create a group…

  • AlisonSomin
    Alison Somin (@AlisonSomin) reported

    @NancyAFrench I never actually canceled my AOL email but no one in my life has written me there for a long, long time

  • marQspekt
    integrityIsPriceless (@marQspekt) reported

    Damn what about the aol folks? Lol

  • htdg3267
    paul polino (@htdg3267) reported

    @CBSNews Remember Nancy's broken hip she was aol

  • Granjacke901
    😷💉☮️ 🇺🇸 (@Granjacke901) reported

    @oelma__ You forgot @aol…I still use it. Service providers ask for my email, and then laugh about it.

  • SergioVengeance
    Sergio Vengeance 🇺🇲🎮🤘 (@SergioVengeance) reported

    @JoelKatz @RealZaikTorek @Awk20000 Not to mention the very first big section 230 case was about AOL and them being too slow to censor a malicious troll who was spreading confirmed lies that led to harassment. So even if the argument is "the website didn't censor this" then that's a core Section 230 argument.