AOL outages and service status in Uxbridge, England
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Full Outage Map
- AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Uxbridge, including 0 direct reports.
AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Uxbridge, England
The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Uxbridge, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
AOL Issues Reports Near Uxbridge, England
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Uxbridge and nearby locations:
-
anthony (@edgfrg) reported from Slough, England@AOLSupportHelp I’m trying to get into my email password help
-
Lee 'Budgie' Barnett (@budgie) reported from Richmond, EnglandCompuServe when I first got online in 1995, MSN Messenger, the very occasional foray into Usenet. Tried AOL, ICQ, a few others. But never enjoyed them. Had both AIM and Yahoo Meseenger But only very rarely used them.
-
Lorraine King (@lorrainemking) reported from Brentford, England@NW6Rd You've just reminded me my contract is up with my absolutely appalling @SkyUK broadband. It's so slow it's like AOL dial-up
-
Doug (@dougmortonagain) reported from Ealing, EnglandThe first PlayStation came out, and Macs transitioned to Power PC. AOL is launched. Amazon was founded. Microsoft announces it will no longer sell or support the MS-DOS operating system separately from Microsoft Windows
-
Paddy 🇵🇱 (@slavicking18) reported from Windsor, EnglandI still have an AOL email address so never question my loyalty
-
Josa Keyes (@JosaKeyes) reported from Ealing, England@Miss_Snuffy Self pity finds many friends online from the earliest days of community forums up to today's toxic social media. "Share your support" we used to say at AOL and people did and lots was valuable, but a deep streak of 'alternative truth' bedded down there too to solicit attention.
-
Robbo (@sjr66qpr) reported from Richmond, England@londongirluk @AOLSupportHelp I'm the same Julie. The app I'm using won't let me sign in
-
-
Matt Stephens (@RealStephens) reported from West Molesey, England@sigmasports I’m doing my best guys, bear with me. I’m doing an online chat with AOL online support and have Ask Jeeves fired up in another browser.
-
Jamie🐝 (@JL_BrentfordFC) reported from Hounslow, EnglandAOL would never go down. Is AOL still a thing?
-
LDN Scottie Pippen (@Alessandro_Babs) reported from Brentford, England@KwakuMMNT 112 by default. Jagged Edge were broadcasting to us using 2001 AOL dial up. Horrible signal.
AOL Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Lawrence L. Wood (@LLawrence74685) reported@brockpierson Read a tech history of AOL and you might get a historical education of the internet service business and it's startup.
-
Peetie Peete (@Peetie_Peete) reported@BrianRoemmele I was working for NyNex in NYC and installed some of the first residential ISDN data lines. Years later, folks started using dial-up internet service after getting AOL cd's in the mail. Then we graduated to DSL and thought the future is here! It's funny looking back at it all.
-
Davidvinc (@TheDavidVinc) reportedI remember when I was young and my mother would take me to the mall. I would bring a small notepad and pencil, then sit in Walden Books and write down things I had to do where I was stuck when I couldn't afford the guide. And as far as Gamefaqs is concerned, I don't think I knew that existed till like 1998 or 1999. It's not like we had social media to talk about different websites, I had to search using AOL keywords.
-
Heartlivehealer7777 (@SpGhVa7777) reported@LikeUrDiane If we stick to AOL being only for emergency use or our own military use only, that would be fine. I miss landline phones.
-
Poow | Open Commission on Vgen (@Poowploof) reportedAlucard had astigmatism before being infected by a demon (why he qualified to AoL? Well, Tigreal.) Apparently when he was younger, he not only had bad eyesight but also bad taste in men.
-
StoneHillWealth (@StoneHillWealth) reported@kejca I was an advisor for Merrill Lynch during the dot com bubble. Henry Blodget said, to buy Yahoo, AOL, and AMZN, one was bound to be a winner. So, it depends on which package you bought. Chris is generally right, MOST of those ‘winning’ stocks of that day turned out to be garbage.
-
Khazar Theory Enthusiast (@ashkenahzee) reported@KayakZztee5 @tombelaviv_ At least he has a gallbladder and a mother. One who didn't die ashamed. One who didn't have repressed anger towards her son for being a useful idiot of the feds just like Jason Kessler and mentally ill disabled former employee of Oddcast and AOL. Sven is his new mommy. Evil mommy
-
jah🪬 (@JahdaKisura) reported@elefaantz literally like i love mel and sol but admitted mel ate sol up but i still agree w aol on the bryce and trinity thing. and then amora ate mel up so bad and that’s okay!!!😭 your faves can be wrong but they don’t get that
-
Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reportedAOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.
-
T s (@Ts7705421096234) reported@harryjsisson Cool. Mapquest is a thing again. Maybe I will stop getting **** for using my aol email from 30 years ago. Every thing comes back into style?