1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. AOL
  4. Stratford
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Stratford, England

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Stratford, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Stratford, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Stratford, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Stratford, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Stratford and nearby locations:

  • YardleyShooting
    Mike Yardley (@YardleyShooting) reported from City of London, England

    Utterly useless service from AOL/Yahoo/TalkTalk yet again following my complaint reference the breakdown/failure of their systems. So irritating when you pay for a service and don't get it. I was told by a rep ref. AOL: "it's a very old platform.." as if that was an excuse. @AOL

  • brokenbottleboy
    Mic Wright 🏳️‍🌈🏴‍☠️ (@brokenbottleboy) reported from Poplar, England

    When it first arrived — and I made a blog there within the first two months of its public existence — @tumblr was the near perfect blogging platform. Then AOL destroyed it. Now it’s a horrible jail where I can’t get rid of this dumb screen. Thanks @automatic.

  • YardleyShooting
    Mike Yardley (@YardleyShooting) reported from City of London, England

    I was told by a rep ref. AOL: "it's a very old platform.." as if that was an excuse. If it doesn't work, they shouldn't take my money. @TalkTalk is a useless outfit too. I was called for months by fake Indian call centres after their data hack. My home internet sucks. @AOL @Ofcom

  • jayfreund
    James Freund (@jayfreund) reported from Poplar, England

    @AOLSupportHelp hi there having trouble accessing my emails at the moment , I’ve tried to reset my password and it won’t allow me to , could you help?

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • WhoIsVendix
    DEMediaIsPropaganda -TXIconoclast Apostle (@WhoIsVendix) reported

    @dom_lucre Smart People Never Trust Media CNN Worthless since apx 2000 When Bannon Brokered Sale. Maybe better under Time Warmer but CEO gone soon after insane AOL buy I schooled older but very green Bannon on need 4 Conserv media at HBS along w Defense Free Riding & China Threat

  • NotPsychoPNut
    PsychoPNut (@NotPsychoPNut) reported

    @RealAlexJones Viruses are boring. I used punters on AOL, NetBus, and Sub7 on IRC victims. I made a script on mIRC, and when someone /joins the #channel, it would send them porn.exe; when they for sure open it, it would pop up a MsgBox "porn is broken rofl.", vbCritical, "oops". #1337h4x0r

  • florida_grand
    Florida Grand (@florida_grand) reported

    Idk where y’all get your crazy “information” but it must be from someone high af. It’s bizarre how y’all keep coming up with the weirdest Netflix streaming show ideas. 1. The Legislature has not tried to enact recreational ********* 2. Byron Donalds does not want to enact recreational ********* 3. Full f*cking stop because why do you need me to LITERALLY tell you something you can ask Google, ChatGPT, Grok, any search engine?!?!?!?!?!? What year do you live in? Are you still using AOL dial up service? Geez

  • ludvanb1313
    JimDon (@ludvanb1313) reported

    @theamelia___ It would be all 20 but i actually never used aol...not once.

  • shaksingh
    SHAKSINGH (@shaksingh) reported

    I still remember how the entire anti-hindu gang had started abusing AOL over a non existent issue.

  • atomeons_ai
    Æ AI 🏴‍☠️ 原子纪元 (@atomeons_ai) reported

    @Scobleizer The moment is set later in retrospect. That's the issue. We look back at the 1000s of moments and pick one. Like AOL CDs but there was much more to the moment. This ebbs in then a crash.

  • LionBlogosphere
    ライオン Lion (@LionBlogosphere) reported

    The top 10 companies that crashed in 2000: Cisco, Microsoft, Intel, Lucent, JDS Uniphase, WorldCom, AOL Time Warner. While the internet and computers did become really big, the market was wrong about every one of these companies except Microsoft, and there was plenty of opportunity to buy it after the crash at a much lower price. (Intel and Cisco are still around as major companies too, but they were extremely overpriced then compared to what they are worth now. Terrible investments even if you had a very long time horizon.) Amazon was considered a minor company (and it crashed big time), Apple was considered a minor has-been company (and it crashed big time), Google wasn't a public company yet, and Facebook didn't even exist. So the point of this is to not believe the market hype about which companies are going to benefit in the long run from AI.

  • gconsig
    greg consiglio (@gconsig) reported

    @jayyeh @bot @openclaw Just like AOL and the Netscape browser were exciting to people who never used IRC. Looks like the potential kernels of what can lead to mass adoption.

  • DaniilBuilds
    Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported

    AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

  • steveharvey2001
    Steve Harvey 🇬🇧🇨🇦 (@steveharvey2001) reported

    @AntiEVidiots When EVs were niche, driving one was like being part of a community with a shared secret. Similar to being on the internet in the early 1990s, before the AOL hordes turned up with their poor netiquette.