AOL outages and service status in Feltham, England

Problems in the last 24 hours in Feltham, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Feltham, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Feltham, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Feltham and nearby locations:

• 
  Doug (@dougmortonagain) reported 3 minutes ago from Ealing, England

  The first PlayStation came out, and Macs transitioned to Power PC. AOL is launched. Amazon was founded. Microsoft announces it will no longer sell or support the MS-DOS operating system separately from Microsoft Windows

• 
  Lee 'Budgie' Barnett (@budgie) reported 11 minutes ago from Richmond, England

  CompuServe when I first got online in 1995, MSN Messenger, the very occasional foray into Usenet. Tried AOL, ICQ, a few others. But never enjoyed them. Had both AIM and Yahoo Meseenger But only very rarely used them.

• 
  Robbo (@sjr66qpr) reported 13 minutes ago from Richmond, England

  @londongirluk @AOLSupportHelp I'm the same Julie. The app I'm using won't let me sign in

• 
  Dan Calladine (@dancall) reported 14 minutes ago from Wandsworth, England

  @neilperkin You'd think they could find a fix. This used to happen with all AOL accounts showing up as 'Virginia' 20 years ago!

• 
  Robbo (@sjr66qpr) reported 20 minutes ago from Richmond, England

  @londongirluk @AOLSupportHelp Still not working 😠

• 
  Lorraine King (@lorrainemking) reported 23 minutes ago from Brentford, England

  @NW6Rd You've just reminded me my contract is up with my absolutely appalling @SkyUK broadband. It's so slow it's like AOL dial-up

• 
  Matt Stephens (@RealStephens) reported 24 minutes ago from West Molesey, England

  @sigmasports I’m doing my best guys, bear with me. I’m doing an online chat with AOL online support and have Ask Jeeves fired up in another browser.

• 
  Paddy 🇵🇱 (@slavicking18) reported 30 minutes ago from Windsor, England

  I still have an AOL email address so never question my loyalty

• 
  Josa Keyes (@JosaKeyes) reported 39 minutes ago from Ealing, England

  @Miss_Snuffy Self pity finds many friends online from the earliest days of community forums up to today's toxic social media. "Share your support" we used to say at AOL and people did and lots was valuable, but a deep streak of 'alternative truth' bedded down there too to solicit attention.

• 
  Jamie🐝 (@JL_BrentfordFC) reported 42 minutes ago from Hounslow, England

  AOL would never go down. Is AOL still a thing?

• 
  LDN Scottie Pippen (@Alessandro_Babs) reported 42 minutes ago from Brentford, England

  @KwakuMMNT 112 by default. Jagged Edge were broadcasting to us using 2001 AOL dial up. Horrible signal.

• 
  anthony (@edgfrg) reported 54 minutes ago from Slough, England

  @AOLSupportHelp I’m trying to get into my email password help

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Mohit (@codewith55) reported 7 minutes ago

  Which email service would you choose as your primary email in 2026? Outlook Proton Mail Gmail Yahoo Mail iCloud Mail Zoho Mail AOL Mail

• 
  Jamie T (@jdtoelle) reported 8 minutes ago

  @FilipPanoski Solve your own problem if the best strategy. If that doesn't work then copy the competition. You don't need to reinvent the wheel. Friendster > MySpace > Facebook AOL Mail > Hotmail > Gmail Hotbot > Infoseek > Yahoo > Google

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 12 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

• 
  Miss EsqHire (@MissEsqHire) reported 13 minutes ago

  Claude v Harvey: My candidate at a small, no-name firm is about to turn down an offer from an international law firm because they use Harvey and his current firm uses Claude. Apparently he cannot live without Claude. Can someone explain this to me like I’m my mom in the ’90s discovering AOL?

• 
  Rakesh Agrawal (@RakeshSFNYC) reported 14 minutes ago

  Beyond the usual senior leadership problems at AOL that doomed Mapquest, there was another: channel conflict. Mapquest had a LOB that was store locators. They would sell widgets to retailers and other businesses that they could put on their own sites. Split personalities like that are always tough. When one side is paying the bills (store locator) it's hard to ship the future.

• 
  Mynxe L. Silles (@MynxeLSilles) reported 16 minutes ago

  Several things to address with AOL mail. First, have had some issues with blocking mail, not getting blocked AFTER having blocked it, repeatedly. Secondly, cut it out with the -targeted ADS with names you know are family relevant. (Prayers)

• 
  Roger Ledbetter (@rledbetterCPA) reported 20 minutes ago

  You want 90s purchasing power but aren’t ready for the trade offs - - Tupac and Biggie releasing albums - Metallica and grunge peaking - Jordan in his prime - AOL instant messenger and no cell phones - Blockbuster video rentals Okay damn nevermind

• 
  KingStudebaker (@KingStudebaker) reported 21 minutes ago

  @MapQuest Lol. People use this ap??? Let me get my old AOL account and login

• 
  GuiDaFunkyMan (@GuiDaFunkyMan) reported 21 minutes ago

  @ArcadeHorizons @virtualmage17 No immersion issue for me in the 80s, just 2 different atmospheres and that's it. In my opinion, lots of players hate AoL either because of a group effect (especially when it comes to Y-gen players and beyond) or because they didn't get its basic gameplay mechanics.

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 23 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.