1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. AOL
  4. Revere
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Revere, Massachusetts

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Revere, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Revere, Massachusetts

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Revere, Massachusetts and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Revere, Massachusetts

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Revere and nearby locations:

  • KyraAzore
    Kyra E. Azore (@KyraAzore) reported from Boston, Massachusetts

    My little sister just graduated from AOL and I was never a fan of the school because the other kids were always out of pocket. I have no idea how she did it all those years.

  • kaymbfoster
    loops thee pony🎀 (@kaymbfoster) reported from Boston, Massachusetts

    This remind me of the time when I said “**** you” in the kids aim group chat with my moms’ aol account and got her blocked off. Boy did she whoop my ass. 🤣

  • romano_1197
    Javi Romano [They/Them] (@romano_1197) reported from Boston, Massachusetts

    “This are either amateur porn stars or bad AOL usernames” -my friend reading twitter handle suggestions

  • byRicardoG
    Ricardo Guillaume (@byRicardoG) reported from Boston, Massachusetts

    @BigWillCarp Yea, she just took the kid’s milk and poured it down the drain. Last season she used a satanic pseudonym on aol instant messenger to weasel her way into his house. Going from Ritchie and his fetish to Ralphie and his fetish alone. Psychopath. 💀

  • hankpena
    H A N K (@hankpena) reported from Revere, Massachusetts

    @JasonRagosta @Reddit @Clubhouse When is this Reddit thing again? And do we have to be signed into it? I never got on Reddit. It looks kind of like an AOL chat room

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • DebbieF78054760
    Debbie F (@DebbieF78054760) reported

    @catturd2 AOL is a fraud who never wanted child.

  • aremz04
    Aremu Azeez (@aremz04) reported

    There's a line in The Lean Startup that stung when I read it last week: "learning" is the oldest excuse in the book for a failure of execution. Eric Ries tells the story of IMVU's first product. His team spent six months building an instant-messaging add-on, based on a genuinely smart-sounding strategy: piggyback on existing IM networks (AOL, Yahoo!, MSN), ride their network effects, spread virally through people's existing friend lists. Whiteboard-brilliant. They launched. Nobody used it. When they finally sat real customers down in front of the product, every assumption fell apart. Customers weren't scared of learning new software - the average teenager ran eight IM clients at once. They didn't want to chat with existing friends through avatars - they wanted to meet strangers. The "obvious" barrier the whole strategy was built around wasn't a barrier at all. Ries's point isn't "test more." It's sharper than that: in a startup, any effort that doesn't produce evidence about what customers actually want is waste - no matter how well it's executed. He calls the real version of this validated learning, to separate it from the after-the-fact story you tell yourself when something doesn't work. I'm sitting in a smaller version of that exact test right now with Owoye. One of the assumptions baked into the product is that WhatsApp and IG sellers want their invoices auto-matched to incoming payments. It sounds obviously useful from where I sit. But that's precisely the position IMVU's team was in - certain, and wrong, about what would remove friction for their customer. So this week will not be spent refining the feature. It will be spent in conversations with actual sellers, watching how they track who's paid right now - screenshots, memory, WhatsApp scrollback - before deciding whether "auto-match" solves their problem or just mine. The uncomfortable question worth asking about your own product this week: is the thing you're building solving a problem your customer has, or a problem you have with how your customer works?

  • MzJenniferB
    Jennifer B (@MzJenniferB) reported

    19 Never used an aol email but I did have the other one lol

  • NubiStreams
    Nubi ⚖️🪲 (@NubiStreams) reported

    @communitybf 19, never had aol I had Netscape haha

  • ronjassme
    Ronald Jansson (@ronjassme) reported

    AOL is certainly likeable. I like her. She's just not here in America's best interest. She's not. Some say she's the enemy. And they may be right. They, are not the enemy, they care about what's good for America. Now AOL has some real jewels seeking out against Americans, as a US Congressperson, she may be over stepping her obligation to the "Right" people. Not that she's never, "Right", you can be Right, and still represent the wrong people. Which people does she actually serve???? That's the Right question.

  • JustThatGuyAdam
    JustThatGuy👨‍💼 (@JustThatGuyAdam) reported

    @klove0518 What an AWFUL aol screen name

  • pbiffdukes
    John Maldaner (@pbiffdukes) reported

    @BigBlueNationD1 19. Never had an AOL address. Didn’t want one.

  • ZeldatheCat3
    zeldacat (@ZeldatheCat3) reported

    @itslunabxo @NoContextHumans You got that ******* right. The internet was fun once. And free of anyone trying to make money but AOL and the like. Sorry for all who never saw it.

  • sspriint
    sprint (@sspriint) reported

    AOL and Time Warner merged in a $165,000,000,000 deal, and two years later the company wrote off $99,000,000,000 in a single year. The announcement came in January 2000, weeks before the dot-com peak. An internet company buying one of the largest media empires on earth. AOL was the smaller business by revenue and profit. It had the stock price, which was the currency that made the deal possible. Steve Case and Gerald Levin stood on stage and called it the future. Dial-up subscribers plus film studios, cable systems, magazines, and music. Then the bubble burst. AOL's advertising revenue collapsed, and the subscriber business began dying as broadband arrived and nobody needed dial-up anymore. The cultures never combined. Time Warner executives resented being bought with inflated paper, and the AOL side found the media business slow. In 2002 the company reported a loss of about $99,000,000,000, the largest annual loss in American corporate history. Almost all of it was writing down the value of AOL itself. The AOL name came off the company in 2003. The two businesses split apart entirely in 2009. Levin later apologized publicly and called himself responsible. The biggest deal ever signed destroyed more value than most companies ever create.

  • GlendaSnyd49796
    Glenda Snyder (@GlendaSnyd49796) reported

    @Matt_Pinner 19...never had an AOL address