NatWest status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours in Wallasey, England

The chart below shows the number of NatWest reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Wallasey, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

NatWest Issues Reports Near Wallasey, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Wallasey and nearby locations:

• 
  Simon B 🇺🇦 (@SimonCBondar) reported 23 minutes ago from Wallasey, England

  @pizzahutuk I had to cancel an order and get a refund. The only way to get a refund is via your customer support contact form. Which is broken. The check boxes don't register they have been ticked. Got to phone NatWest to get a refund. No phone number, no direct email. Do better

• 
  Ste Burke (@SteBurke44) reported 24 minutes ago from Liverpool, England

  Also, **** Natwest. When asked can they help track down where the payments been sent. They’ve said because she’s give him her bank details she isn’t eligible for a refund. ******* rats mate. Snapping my card up as I speak

• 
  davebutter (@davebutter) reported 30 minutes ago from Roby, England

  Why are credit scores so differing on each site? My clear score looks like I could get a Range Rover and a mortgage. The one on my natwest looks like I’d struggle to get a studio catalog account

• 
  Ste Burke (@SteBurke44) reported 32 minutes ago from Liverpool, England

  Always check your bank statements. Mad the way someone’s set up a PayPal direct debit weekly from my bank account for £134 and PayPal are saying it’s a natwest issue and natwest are saying it’s a PayPal issue.

• 
  Jonesy (@PeterJones31) reported 54 minutes ago from Birkenhead, England

  This #TheHundred is ******* garbage bring back the natwest trophy #propercricket

NatWest Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Jerome De Spencer (@clusterfeck) reported 3 minutes ago

  Click the pic for a full report especially if you are a NATWEST customer.

• 
  Rob W R 🇪🇺 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 (@Woollygar) reported 5 minutes ago

  @give_me_caffine Worked with a guy in NatWest 1980's who was asked if he was a Welsh speaker by a well healed female customer said 'no, I've forgotten it all' She shunned him. Told me after that use was beaten out of him in school so his parents stopped using it at home & he just stopped using it

• 
  Mancunian 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (@Mancunian63) reported 11 minutes ago

  @NatWest_Help customer service at natwest is dead. Got a platinum account that's useless. The insurance it comes with is worthless. Rang to complain, and they transferred me to the insurer I was complaining about. They tried to fob me off by transferring me to someone else. Joke.

• 
  Paul Lewis (@paullewismoney) reported 12 minutes ago

  @Helixd @OborneTweets It was entirely different. Coutts didn’t debank him. It told him he was no longer welcome as a customer and offered him an ordinary NatWest account - it owns Coutts. It was F who turned it into a victimisation story.

• 
  Halal&Tayyib Organics 🍃 (@NaturezFynest) reported 13 minutes ago

  @grok Ofcourse not! Why would they leave an Internet trail. Bank of England funds Natwest, HSBC, Barclays etc. An overnight shut down of all their accounts for unproven allegations.... no link, yeah okay! 👍

• 
  Spencer (@SpencerGambles) reported 14 minutes ago

  **** happened with natwest but with around 20x more… absolute shitbags they are

• 
  Ed MacNaughton (@EdMacnaughton) reported 19 minutes ago

  Nearly 24 hours since I called your automated service for a call back. Clearly need to review our accounts with NatWest.

• 
  Lorraine Morris (@MLorrM) reported 19 minutes ago

  In the case of Perks v NatWest Markets Plc (evidence given around 2022), Mr Neil Graham — a GRG director, chartered accountant and experienced banker — was cross-examined under oath about the bank’s RMP credit system entries for swap-related credit lines / contingent obligations (often referred to as CLU – Credit Line Utilisation). Key exchanges reported in the materials include: 🔹Mr Graham accepted that the credit-line entry on the RMP system represented the client’s contingent obligation. 🔹Mr Graham agreed it was a factor the bank used when considering in loan-to-value calculations for the overall connection. 🔹When asked whether it could push a connection over a loan-to-value ratio covenant, he answered (subject to market movements) yes. 🔹He further accepted that this could ultimately lead to the connection being transferred into GRG. 🔹Mr Graham is experienced and the testimony is truthful; however, as happened in Ireland - bank’s counsel later attempted to “distance the bank from this evidence in closing submissions”. 🔹Surprise, surprise but bank’s counsel is categorically misleading the Court. 🔹They characterised Graham’s answers as given “on the hoof,” - said it was not his specialist area and submitted that he was wrong on the LTV impact point. 🔹They argued the bank did not accept that the CLU had the effect claimed and that there was no duty to volunteer information about it to the customer. 🔹This was what bank counsel is required to do to keep the charade going and that they cavalierly do so is a scandal in itself. 🔹Mr Graham’s testimony exists and is on the public record, as circulated by campaigners and referenced in related presentations. 🔹So, a senior bank director & chartered accountant with a GRG/risk-adjacent role did accept under oath that the credit line could cause or contribute to an LTV breach and subsequent transfer into GRG. 🔹This is rather obvious and is in fact why the products were sold in the first instance - as confirmed by numerous insiders. 🔹NatWest’s formal position in that case (and more generally) has been to treat such lines as “internal risk measures” rather than customer-facing hard liabilities that automatically breach covenants in the way alleged, and to reject the broader fraud characterisation. But that would be their formal position would it not? When billions of euros is at stake? 🔹Meanwhile customers faced enormous break costs & this fact alone is wholly inconsistent with the characterisation of the credit line as a purely internal risk measure. 🔹It is however consistent with the reality, which is that the bank had booked (and later crystallised) an exposure against their customers and the credit line had been concealed. 🔹That bank counsel filed pleadings that falsely characterised these structures as just fixing an interest rate or just ordinary fixed-rate loans, facilitating the burying of the misrepresentations under layers of legal process - is a further scandal - akin to that whereby the lawyers who managed to lock up innocent sub-postmasters on foot of unsound evidence. 🔹The result for Irish SMEs duped by theses practices was a systematic extraction of value from those SMEs - while the guilty institution and its lawyers ensured that accountability remained permanently out of reach. @ArturNadol7566 @Wftproof

• 
  Mando (@AcFanatic2020) reported 23 minutes ago

  @johntierney73 @NnatMmac @NatWest NatWest are still **** like this

• 
  LiveSquawk (@LiveSquawk) reported 24 minutes ago

  NatWest H1 2026 Earnings - Q2 Pretax Oper Profit GBP 2.29B (est 2.01B) - H1 Impairment Charge Of £280 M, Prev Y/Y £226 M - Keeps Ordinary *** Around 50% Attributable Profit - Sees 2026 ROTE +19% - Still Sees 2028 ROTE Above +18% - Still Sees 2028 Customer Assets And Liabilities Rising +4% From End 2025