AOL outages and service status in Maldon, England

Problems in the last 24 hours in Maldon, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Maldon, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Maldon, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Maldon and nearby locations:

• 
  fran (@frannyannew) reported 23 minutes ago from Thundersley, England

  @aolmail been three days since we have had access to our emails. Not getting much help from #Aol at the moment. Please help us get back on line. #badcustomerservice

• 
  Chris Crowther (@hikariuk) reported 24 minutes ago from Maldon, England

  @theretrobyte I think I would still have been with Dungeon/FlexNet back then. Never used any of the likes of AOL, Freeserve, etc.

• 
  John Van Praag (@JohnVanPraag) reported 35 minutes ago from Great Notley, England

  @AOLSupportHelp I have an AOL app on my iPad with a load of no longer valid contact addresses. When I delete them via the on line site they do not disappear from my iPad contacts. There is no tick box on the iPad contacts to facilitate deleting them direct! Help!!

• 
  Elvin K. Box MCIOB MBA(Open) (@ElvinBox) reported 39 minutes ago from Basildon, England

  @aolmail assume the email telling me my request to terminate my AOL account; which of course I did not, will be carried out in 3 working days, is obviously a scam email? Many thanks in advance xx

• 
  Mike Yardley (@YardleyShooting) reported 41 minutes ago from Colchester, England

  @TalkTalk , @Yahoo and @AOL seem to have the greatest difficulty maintaining a normal service. I pay for a service which I am not getting. I am cut off from my email at the moment. Previously, I have been plagued by Indian sub continent scammers because of a data breach. #NotGood

• 
  Brian O'Keefe (@rider45) reported 49 minutes ago from Great Baddow, England

  @anildash I can remember Microsoft trying to launch their own network to compete with the internet or so it seemed, I joined got an account then had to wait about an hour, via dialup, to cancel it, back to AOL it was for me.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Time Capsule Tales (@timecaptales) reported 7 minutes ago

  On the day Michael Jackson died in 2009, the internet collapsed. The LA Times, AOL, TMZ, AIM, and several other major sites completely crashed. Searches for the King of Pop spiked to an insane ~4.2 million per minute. Google believed it was under some kind of cyber attack because of the sudden flood of people searching “Michael Jackson”. Twitter went down and Wikipedia crashed around 3:15 p.m. PDT.

• 
  Ryan Clark (@ryan_theprofit) reported 7 minutes ago

  My dad replied to news about my girlfriend with a green check mark. Honestly, appropriate. Our generation only writes well over text because we had to get good at it to date. AOL Instant Messenger, then years of practice with the stakes turned all the way up. His generation never needed the skill, so they never built it. The thumbs up isn't him being short with you. It's the whole sentence.

• 
  DOT_Singularity🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 (@DOT_singularity) reported 9 minutes ago

  @SteveMoraco Boo- friggidty-hooo, This is nothing new. I want the AI to be able to pull in context from **** I wrote on AOL in 1995. My online **** game was strong! If you're Laboring under some expectation of ever having true privacy in the digital world , it's a fools errand. Crack on.

• 
  Asymmetric Edge Research (@AsymEdge) reported 10 minutes ago

  @2147mill The problem with the normie test is that the internet passed it in 1999 too. Totally non techy families were on AOL back then as well, over 20 million of them by the end of 1999. Amazon went from 17 million customers to 25 million between 1999 and 2001 and nearly doubled revenue, and the stock still lost 94% over those two years. So usage only tells you the thing is real. For the bubble question I look at what people pay for the earnings. Cisco was over 100x forward at the 2000 top, Nvidia is under 20x right now. Same thing with the crypto half of your post by the way. Nobody uses gold day to day either and that never made gold a bubble.

• 
  ColonelPopcorn🫡🇺🇸🍿 (@WickedAwake) reported 12 minutes ago

  They siphoned our pennies so easily. Not to mention the fact that the prices are so overinflated in so many products. Bleach went from .49 to $10. Rubber bands and envelopes are $7! And then they put a bunch of poisons in their products to kill us slowly and keep us dumb. Things have gone to **** since WE GOT MAIL from AOL. One of the first images we saw was **** with a horse. The world as I knew it Jumped The Shark that day. This evil has been getting bigger and better for a long time. And with the internet, they got faster. I pray to God that our Saviors and Military and Allies have this under control and that We truly are safe. God Bless us all 🙏

• 
  ライオン Lion (@LionBlogosphere) reported 13 minutes ago

  The top 10 companies that crashed in 2000: Cisco, Microsoft, Intel, Lucent, JDS Uniphase, WorldCom, AOL Time Warner. While the internet and computers did become really big, the market was wrong about every one of these companies except Microsoft, and there was plenty of opportunity to buy it after the crash at a much lower price. (Intel and Cisco are still around as major companies too, but they were extremely overpriced then compared to what they are worth now. Terrible investments even if you had a very long time horizon.) Amazon was considered a minor company (and it crashed big time), Apple was considered a minor has-been company (and it crashed big time), Google wasn't a public company yet, and Facebook didn't even exist. So the point of this is to not believe the market hype about which companies are going to benefit in the long run from AI.

• 
  JimDon (@ludvanb1313) reported 13 minutes ago

  @theamelia___ It would be all 20 but i actually never used aol...not once.

• 
  Jackson Styles (@Jackez89) reported 13 minutes ago

  @theamelia___ 19, Australia never got AOL

• 
  Currer Ellis (@ActonBell) reported 14 minutes ago

  @DerrickEvans4WV Can we just go back to AOL and dial up internet? Do we really need everything connected to everything…? I don’t think so. Let’s cancel this AI stuff.

• 
  The Dread Bunny (@jpvanhoy) reported 16 minutes ago

  @lili_poobear @Phantom_King_99 @gizalovespizza Ok, look, you can probably find a half dozen slightly different definitions of the word "evolve" online (we both know you didn't use a dead-tree dictionary). But the fact remains, to not evolve is to stagnate. Even the definition you gave, if converted the boolean opposite, would say, "to NOT develop gradually, especially from a simple to a more complex form", and you could then argue that OP wants it to get more complex, but RAPIDLY rather than SLOWLY. The point is technology should always advance. Just because you're unhappy with some specific implementation of technology in the present, doesn't mean that "advance" will mean "things get worse". It's pretty childish to take that position, in fact. I mean, for ****'s sake, you're ON THE INTERNET right now, probably using either wireless broadband, or wired broadband access to post this message. Can you imagine sitting in at your computer desk, with the monitor riser and built-in CD-ROM storage slots, dialing into AOL in about 1996 and saying, "GAH! I don't want technology to evolve any more. I'm tired of sitting here waiting for JPGs of John Stamos to take 40 seconds to load. I'm tired of getting my directions from Mapquest!"