1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. AOL
  4. Maldon
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Maldon, England

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Maldon, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Maldon, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Maldon, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Maldon, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Maldon and nearby locations:

  • hikariuk
    Chris Crowther (@hikariuk) reported from Maldon, England

    @theretrobyte I think I would still have been with Dungeon/FlexNet back then. Never used any of the likes of AOL, Freeserve, etc.

  • frannyannew
    fran (@frannyannew) reported from Thundersley, England

    @aolmail been three days since we have had access to our emails. Not getting much help from #Aol at the moment. Please help us get back on line. #badcustomerservice

  • YardleyShooting
    Mike Yardley (@YardleyShooting) reported from Colchester, England

    @TalkTalk , @Yahoo and @AOL seem to have the greatest difficulty maintaining a normal service. I pay for a service which I am not getting. I am cut off from my email at the moment. Previously, I have been plagued by Indian sub continent scammers because of a data breach. #NotGood

  • JohnVanPraag
    John Van Praag (@JohnVanPraag) reported from Great Notley, England

    @AOLSupportHelp I have an AOL app on my iPad with a load of no longer valid contact addresses. When I delete them via the on line site they do not disappear from my iPad contacts. There is no tick box on the iPad contacts to facilitate deleting them direct! Help!!

  • ElvinBox
    Elvin K. Box MCIOB MBA(Open) (@ElvinBox) reported from Basildon, England

    @aolmail assume the email telling me my request to terminate my AOL account; which of course I did not, will be carried out in 3 working days, is obviously a scam email? Many thanks in advance xx

  • rider45
    Brian O'Keefe (@rider45) reported from Great Baddow, England

    @anildash I can remember Microsoft trying to launch their own network to compete with the internet or so it seemed, I joined got an account then had to wait about an hour, via dialup, to cancel it, back to AOL it was for me.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • Niggerlogic
    Merica (@Niggerlogic) reported

    @MapQuest Who ******** even know your app exists anymore If you needed to show how ******* retarded your company is You just did it You were forgotten around the AOL timeline ******* obsolescent retards

  • AsymEdge
    Asymmetric Edge Research (@AsymEdge) reported

    @2147mill The problem with the normie test is that the internet passed it in 1999 too. Totally non techy families were on AOL back then as well, over 20 million of them by the end of 1999. Amazon went from 17 million customers to 25 million between 1999 and 2001 and nearly doubled revenue, and the stock still lost 94% over those two years. So usage only tells you the thing is real. For the bubble question I look at what people pay for the earnings. Cisco was over 100x forward at the 2000 top, Nvidia is under 20x right now. Same thing with the crypto half of your post by the way. Nobody uses gold day to day either and that never made gold a bubble.

  • B_SuttyNY
    Brian Suttmiller (@B_SuttyNY) reported

    @Irina_exh 19 for me. Never had an AOL address.

  • mrmula973
    mr mula (@mrmula973) reported

    @Carpetpatch1 @OrevaZSN you act like AOL went extinct when 2000 came around. And honestly don’t give a **** about what it looked like back then. Everything yall had, we have now x10 and some more. Tf are you saying?

  • BigTodd1776
    Todd AF (@BigTodd1776) reported

    @DavidShafer I thought @mapquest went out with AOL online, my bad...I do remember when cassette tape got feisty with Compact Disk for about 15 minutes, then they just went away. Bye Mapquest.

  • SJSU4me
    Nancy (@SJSU4me) reported

    @Irina_exh Never had an AOL Address. Yes to the rest....

  • gregnacu
    Gregorio Naçu (@gregnacu) reported

    @MuseumCommodore 17 for me. Never used a TAC-2. I am too young to have seen a C64 running in a store. But I have left things like the 10-print maze running on a C64 I found in use at a daycare. I sadly missed QuantumLink. I called the 800 number once, and an AOL rep answered.

  • DaniilBuilds
    Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported

    AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

  • SloppyK556
    Kevin K (@SloppyK556) reported

    @Irina_exh 18. Never sent a postcard and never had an AOL address.

  • DarthVegeta
    Michael R. Rambo Jr. (@DarthVegeta) reported

    @Irina_exh 18 out of 20. Never had a waterbed; never had an AOL address