AOL outages and service status in Kelvedon, England

Problems in the last 24 hours in Kelvedon, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Kelvedon, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Kelvedon, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Kelvedon and nearby locations:

• 
  Mike Yardley (@YardleyShooting) reported 1 second ago from Colchester, England

  @TalkTalk , @Yahoo and @AOL seem to have the greatest difficulty maintaining a normal service. I pay for a service which I am not getting. I am cut off from my email at the moment. Previously, I have been plagued by Indian sub continent scammers because of a data breach. #NotGood

• 
  John Van Praag (@JohnVanPraag) reported 27 minutes ago from Great Notley, England

  @AOLSupportHelp I have an AOL app on my iPad with a load of no longer valid contact addresses. When I delete them via the on line site they do not disappear from my iPad contacts. There is no tick box on the iPad contacts to facilitate deleting them direct! Help!!

• 
  Chris Crowther (@hikariuk) reported 27 minutes ago from Maldon, England

  @theretrobyte I think I would still have been with Dungeon/FlexNet back then. Never used any of the likes of AOL, Freeserve, etc.

• 
  James Freund (@jayfreund) reported 43 minutes ago from Earls Colne, England

  Any technical wizards out there , been with out email for 6 days now , having grief with @aol trying to retrieve my password , HELP

• 
  Brian O'Keefe (@rider45) reported 54 minutes ago from Great Baddow, England

  @anildash I can remember Microsoft trying to launch their own network to compete with the internet or so it seemed, I joined got an account then had to wait about an hour, via dialup, to cancel it, back to AOL it was for me.

• 
  James Freund (@jayfreund) reported 55 minutes ago from Earls Colne, England

  @aol what does it take to help get back into my emails , Phones played up and won’t let me reset my password !!! Please help

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Nick Greig (@NickG_80) reported 10 minutes ago

  @rovabtw Used to be standard for me. AOL chat back in the day (son's mother) or Facebook. Never a dating site.

• 
  D Mace 🍊🍊🍊🍊🍊🍊🍊 (@DMace51) reported 10 minutes ago

  @SueJ2024 I never had AOL but I had poor dial up internet.

• 
  Richard Gallagher (@RichardRicoba) reported 10 minutes ago

  @Ken_FiveSolas 18, never used AOL email and never slept on a waterbed

• 
  serenity (@the_goldweaver) reported 13 minutes ago

  @asterokosmosvt I'm 18 only cause I'm not American so no AOL and I was too poor to afford a walkman

• 
  Arbatel de Persecute (@arbatel1979) reported 13 minutes ago

  @Maegatron3030 19 for me. I never messed with AOL. Those discs we’d get for free though. All the time!

• 
  BAT-SALEH (@BATVRABEL) reported 15 minutes ago

  @Quadripolar_B I was in one in the AOL days. I dominated that **** until they asked me to run it. I still have some of the shows I wrote. I can't believe I ever had the imagination and attention span for that. I gave myself carpal tunnel.

• 
  Brett Caughran (@FundamentEdge) reported 15 minutes ago

  My playful analogy is we are in the AOL era of AI. Early stage of a revolutionary technology, but the delivery mechanism is still clunky, requiring really dumb concepts like prompt engineering. In 1996, you couldn't even imagine business models like Uber, Netflix, the iPhone, YouTube or Tesla FSD, because the technology wasn't even close to capable or cost effective enough. From 1996-2006 global data volume grew by a factor of 10,000,000x (per Gemini), but that growth was hugely deflationary (wholesale IP transit cost down 99%), i.e. good for the application layer and selectively bad for the pipe owners (telecom). Overall, the mix of massive volume growth offset against gnarly price deflation has been a, net/net, positive thing for telecom investing. Does that hold for the frontier labs? "Intelligence pipe" feels like it can be a pretty damn awesome business, but, like telecoms, the evolution of "intelligence pipe as a business" will be extremely path dependent and will require real business models with attractive unit economics to fund. Obviously most of the 90's era telecoms went bust and the assets were only financially productive for the 2nd or 3rd owners, mostly due to balance sheet issues & the subsequent closing of the capital markets window. Though capital markets have evolved materially since the early 2000's telecom bust with a regulatory environment more supportive of monopolies/oligopolies and private capital markets more supportive of funding massive cash burn (to wit, I think it's a really bad idea for Anthropic to IPO in '26, but what do I know?). So imagine that prior but like 10-100x the size of the internet. Maybe more? As in 1996 when you couldn't even envision Netflix/Uber, the iPhone or Tesla FSD, we have zero idea what 2056 looks like, but the exponential will certainly drive even more upside uncertainty in technology. idk, hard to be structurally bearish on the "intelligence pipe" and subsequently, infrastructure that feeds the pipe (though it feels certain there will be super gnarly potholes, messy shakeouts, and bankruptcies along the way, as we saw in telecom evolution), and ultimately what matters is free cash flow production, which feeds from the intersection of exponential volumes against unit level deflation. What's exciting to me with the improvement in the models, both frontier like Fable/Sol and open source like Kimi/GLM/Deep-Seek, is you are getting *closer* so seeing a real application layer possible in a very intellectually difficult sandbox like public market investing. Nearly four years from GPT 3.5 demo, we still aren't there. We are still in the "AOL era" - too slow, not competent enough, too expensive. But are we exiting that era? It feels to me like we might be. If I had to guess, my guess is the frontier labs continue to be good businesses (and extremely volatile public stocks), mostly due to the reflexive nature of capital markets & talent acquisition. But what seems really obvious, to me, is that 2026-2036 is going to be the era of the application layer, where the Travis Kalanick-style entrepreneur takes this "intelligence pipe" and envisions new & groundbreaking businesses that change the world. That entrepreneurial accelerate will drive durable and accelerating demand for the intelligence pipe, it seems. It's a really exciting time to be alive.

• 
  St.Doritos™ (@StDoritos) reported 15 minutes ago

  @krus_chiki True, like I said earlier , after the feds raid you and rough you up and destroy your ****. You can try to explain to some local circuit judge who probably still uses AOL for their email , how you are a part of special protected and exempt group. Or you can submit your forms.

• 
  Ian Landsman (@IanLandsman) reported 21 minutes ago

  @jessethanley @PatBergie We’ll hash this out tomorrow but don’t agree. Slack is basically just AOL IM. Think AI pilled are way over thinking how many problems AI directly solves for normal people. It’s not many. Now indirectly sure. Medical breakthroughs, better software, as part of a good home robot. But direct it’s basically just google search.

• 
  Joe HxC (@Thejoehardcore) reported 21 minutes ago

  @xinspiteofx There has never been one message. If there was, there wouldnt be nearly 50 years of people making sounds about unity. Defining fakes now is worse than the dial aol days. Anyone with the internet is a hc influencer. So define hardcore before going forward with anything else.