Post Office outages and service status in Holywell, Wales

Problems in the last 24 hours in Holywell, Wales

The chart below shows the number of Post Office reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Holywell, Wales and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Post Office Issues Reports Near Holywell, Wales

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Holywell and nearby locations:

• 
  Antony (@AntGeorgetwo) reported 12 minutes ago from Neston, England

  @NestonNews As #neston resident we do not know when the postoffice going to reopen. Why can't we have the postoffice van that visits #Willaston come to #Nestonmarket on a Friday this would work for are community to use their services in which we need. I hope everyone @NestonTC/ CWAC can help

• 
  Gavin Wrigley (@pheauteau) reported 18 minutes ago from Liverpool, England

  @PostOffice @RoyalMail any issues with deliveries in SG9? Two parcels this past week have failed to arrive.

• 
  Nicia holman (@Niciaholman) reported 24 minutes ago from Heswall, England

  I sent a parcel back 12/11 i am yet to receive confirmation that you have had it or any refund!? I have receipt for proof from @PostOffice @verynetwork please help

• 
  bemed (@bernardomed) reported 33 minutes ago from Liverpool, England

  Dear @PostOffice **** YOU! Your website tells me that your branch will provide me with a slip for the CN23 form but guess what, they never had and never seen one.

• 
  Whittle (@Paulwhittle8) reported 47 minutes ago from Wallasey, England

  @WirralCouncil @PostOffice Should Never have left Oxton Road!!

Post Office Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Adam Pawłowski🇵🇱 (@adpaw13) reported 17 seconds ago

  @lily_lna @PostOffice Well - I guess putting more 3rd worlders is going to help situation further …

• 
  Artur Nadolny (@ArturNadol7566) reported 2 minutes ago

  POST OFFICE REWRITES ITS OWN SCANDAL I was reading through the Post Office Process Review page on the corporate @PostOffice website when one paragraph was cought my attention... The PPR, was set up after the Common Issues Judgment in March 2019, the ruling that came out of Alan Bates and others versus Post Office Limited and first forced Post Office to admit its Horizon accounting system was unreliable and that postmasters had been wrongly blamed for shortfalls the system itself created. "Since the Common Issues Judgment in March 2019, we have carried out work across the business to identify products, policies or processes that may have caused financial loss to Postmasters because of the way they were designed or delivered." The background section on the page says Post Office has carried out work to identify products, policies or processes that may have caused financial loss to postmasters because of the way they were designed or delivered. That phrasing removes Post Office as the party doing the designing and delivering. The losses did not just happen because of how something was designed, Post Office designed it. "We wish to put this right in a straightforward and transparent way, and we have therefore set up the Post Office Process Review to provide financial redress for current and former Postmasters who were impacted." A line further down says Post Office wishes to put this right in a straightforward and transparent way. That reads as voluntary goodwill. What actually happened is a court judgment forced Post Office to admit fault after years of fighting the litigation that proved it, and the PPR exists because of that judgment, not out of an independent wish to be transparent. "You may be aware that there have also been other redress schemes available for people impacted by the Horizon IT Scandal. You can submit a request to the Post Office Process Review whether or not you have separately received a payment or have a case in progress through any of those other redress schemes." Then comes the paragraph that caught my attention most. It tells readers there have also been other redress schemes available for people impacted by the Horizon IT Scandal, and that a postmaster can apply to the PPR whether or not they have already received a payment through one of those other schemes. Read on its own, with no background on the case, this makes Post Office sound like an intermediary. Something called the Horizon IT Scandal happened to postmasters, and Post Office is now helping them access redress for it, alongside other schemes that also exist to help. Post Office built and ran the Horizon system. Post Office prosecuted postmasters using data from that system. Post Office fought the litigation that eventually proved the system was flawed, for years, at public expense, before the judgment forced its hand. The redress schemes named here, including the PPR itself, exist because Post Office caused the losses they compensate. The page also treats the PPR issues and the Horizon IT Scandal as two separate subjects, one involving products, policies and processes, the other a scandal that happened elsewhere, to other people, through other schemes. A postmaster or anybody else reading this without prior context could reasonably conclude that Post Office is a well-meaning administrator cleaning up a mess it did not create. Most people who land on this page are not journalists or campaigners. They are current or former postmasters, or their family members, trying to work out if they are owed money and how to ask for it, and many will not have followed the litigation, the public inquiry, or the years of reporting that established what actually happened. For that reader, the framing on this page is the information. If it tells them Post Office is helping victims of a scandal rather than admitting to causing one, that is what they will take away, and it will shape how much scrutiny they think the process deserves. Post Office has spent years controlling how this story gets told, first by denying there was a problem at all, then by fighting compensation claims, and now by writing its own compensation scheme in language that keeps the institution at arm's length from what it did. The wording on this page is small. The pattern is not.

• 
  Sharu (@sharu0209) reported 2 minutes ago

  Can you please share the Post Office customer care number? I want to check my savings account details #postoffice @narendramodi

• 
  AI Warning (@phil282yahoo) reported 2 minutes ago

  @twasthentisnow @lily_lna @PostOffice She was a customer, not a worker.

• 
  lalaland 👑 (@fyleman) reported 4 minutes ago

  @lily_lna @PostOffice OMG I'm SHOCKED.... I saw this story elsewhere and I thought u were an EMPLOYEE (& I said that, while u look lovely, I didn't feel it was appropriate BUSINESS WEAR) But I'd misunderstood!! As a CUSTOMER, OF COURSE YOU ARE APPROPRIATELY DRESSED I hope u take this up with the PO🤬

• 
  Colin Butler, CSCS (@foxygrandpafit) reported 4 minutes ago

  @lily_lna @PostOffice This is ridiculous because I wore the same thing at Post Office and didn't have any issues.

• 
  SammyKattan 🇦🇹🇮🇶🇮🇱 (@SammyHistorian) reported 6 minutes ago

  @lily_lna @PostOffice WTF. You have my support. Nice outfit btw

• 
  MoveForward2026 (@forward20282654) reported 7 minutes ago

  @lily_lna @twasthentisnow @PostOffice Why didn’t you make that clear on your OP. As a customer , the shop have no business telling you that you can’t wear that outfit. As an employee they may require you to dress in work attire . And it’s “backless”, not “blackless”.

• 
  Miss Habic (@Hairetikos77) reported 9 minutes ago

  @twasthentisnow @lily_lna @PostOffice Its clear that she was a customer.

• 
  Slippin (@Slip2Darkness) reported 11 minutes ago

  @tradn19 @PostOffice @lily_lna She was a customer, you senile old fool, not a worker.