NatWest status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours in Broxbourne District, England

The chart below shows the number of NatWest reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Broxbourne District, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

NatWest Issues Reports Near Broxbourne District, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Broxbourne District and nearby locations:

• 
  Ila (@crazyzombienerd) reported 27 seconds ago from Broxbourne District, England

  Ginally going to close my accounts with Natwest. Worst customer service & 99% of staff very rude. @NatWest

• 
  Ila (@crazyzombienerd) reported 11 minutes ago from Broxbourne District, England

  Finally closing all my accounts with Natwest as extremely poor service & 99% of staff very rude. @NatWest

• 
  JULIO 🏴‍☠️🖤🔝🏴⬛️◼️◾️▪️ (@julio_bcn_) reported 12 minutes ago from London Colney, England

  @NatWest_Help I have been trying to get a bank statement with my address on it! Is so difficult! I need a proof of address to get some help as I have Covid #natwestbank services in that respect is appalling! You should be able to get that on the NatWest app #appalling

• 
  Sharon Stephenson (@shazzstevo) reported 16 minutes ago from Enfield Lock, England

  @NatWest_Help. I accidentally paid funds to a NatWest Credit Card via faster payment. This credit card was closed a few years back. It took me 3 calls to get some info & I was advised it could take up to 21 days. I am a NatWest customer & it was paid to NatWest Account.

• 
  Steven (@freddiecamp) reported 18 minutes ago from Epping, England

  Been Crypto trading. RBS debit card- 1st transaction went through, next blocked. Call from NatWest fraud team- account frozen. Passed all security questions, but instructed to go to a branch to show some ID. Also had lecture on cons of trading. WTF it’s my money! @NatWest_Help 🤬

• 
  GAIL WOOD (@GAILWOOD10) reported 36 minutes ago from Stevenage District, England

  @Tesco I took it to nationwide, which technically isn’t a bank, I’m going to NatWest today, hopefully they will take it, if not I will do what you suggest with my club card, thank you for your help, I will let you know how I get on .

• 
  luke Charles (@luke44282906) reported 49 minutes ago from Romford, England

  @JabiruMusa9 I’ve contacted NatWest Scam team 👍don’t worry, I have everything to help me and NO SCAMMERS, FACE VALUE ONLY and PAPER TICKETS ONLY ⚒

• 
  Chris Tindall (@chewytheleftie) reported 56 minutes ago from Walthamstow, England

  @aaronjdoots @NatWest_Help That is ridiculous. I stopped banking with NatWest years ago, awful attempt at a bank.

NatWest Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Jijingi u Ter (@jijingiUter) reported 2 minutes ago

  @iSlimfit God bless them indeed Deloitte leads with 26 weeks full pay from day one (flexible too can spread it out), same for NatWest, Aviva, and BT. Proper family support like this is a game-changer. Makes you wonder when more sectors (and countries) will catch up.

• 
  dav1d.btc (@dav1dbtc) reported 3 minutes ago

  BoE warnings about stablecoin redemption are a joke. Try withdrawing any significant amount of cash from your bank and see how simple 'redemption' really is. Recently, UK bank NatWest blocked a customer from withdrawing their own money because they would not explain to the bank why the cash. And the Ombudsman backed the bank. This isn’t about consumer protection. It’s about protecting the banking monopoly. If Andrew Bailey is genuinely concerned about redemption risk, he should be looking at non-custodial systems like Ducat. Redemption happens in one Bitcoin block. I think I may be waiting some time.

• 
  Paul mear (@spottywolf) reported 6 minutes ago from Ludlow, England

  @MartinSLewis Mortgage question - my fixed rate is up end of June with NatWest 🥲 Got 7 years left. Fix or tracker ?

• 
  NoOrdinaryFamily (@BooksFromNOF) reported 7 minutes ago

  Don't you just love it when your @NatWest account gets locked for a second time in a week and you can't access your money? The second I get back to the UK, that account is getting binned. ******* useless.

• 
  Magic hat 🎩 (@themagic_tophat) reported 11 minutes ago

  𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗠𝗮𝗻 𝗖𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝟭𝟭𝟱 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻? I know a certain commentator on the case (who claims insider knowledge) asserts there’s been no decision as of 2 weeks ago. But I very much doubt an initial decision is still pending - I believe it’s been issued to parties. There’s no reason why we would hear if it had. Initial decisions have never been published or leaked prior to the Final Award before. Why do I think it’s been issued? Because it’s been more than 19 months since the hearing concluded. A delay as long as 19 months for an initial decision on liability would put the integrity of the decision at risk and would raise questions over the arbitrators’ intentions (did they delay on purpose to damage it). I just can’t see them having done that. For context, NatWest Markets plc v Bilta (UK) Ltd [2021] was ordered a retrial when its decision was still waiting after 19 months at the High Court. The Master of Rolls at the Court of Appeal absolutely blasted the delay. He said decisions like these should need a good reason to take over 3 months in the courts and if they do, they get closely monitored. For it to take this long in private arbitration when there’s a requirement in the rules for a decision as soon as practicable… and the arbitrators have been working on other cases… totally inexcusable if it weren’t already out. Career enders for the arbitrators. A hearing on sanctions and final award should be quick too. So no excuses. Only 3 possibilities I see: 1) Initial decision was already issued to parties and a Final Award is coming imminently. Before the season starts. 2) They have the Final Award already but they’re waiting for the end of the World Cup before publishing it (they shouldn’t do this and it could even open themselves up to damages if this were the case) 3) City launched an appeal after the decision on liability was issued but before the hearing on sanctions, thereby delaying a Final Award Number 3) would be novel (i.e., never done before) but the rules do not explicitly prohibit it. I’ve hypothesised it as a possibility for a while. If so, we might not hear anything until 2027. The longer it goes without a Final Award, the more likely I believe that’s what’s happened.

• 
  JoeRoot𓃵 (@NO_1TestBatter) reported 15 minutes ago

  @temporary_sw6y Right taking down this post bcz i checked from Espn & it hasn’t mentioned it as bilateral but as Natwest series so got confused.

• 
  Chris (@ChrisXrp2) reported 19 minutes ago

  @CleansedTweets Natwest have never given me problems

• 
  AbolishHolyrood (@exilejock) reported 20 minutes ago

  @SigniusNetworks @PippaCrerar @Annaisaac Except he did meet the criteria. NatWest CEO Alison Rose had to resign due to her serious error after discussing Ferage's bank details with the BBC. The NatWest will have learned their lesson.

• 
  That ginger guy (@Jhinchliffe07) reported 22 minutes ago

  @DanNeidle Yeah i set up a stocks and shares isa with natwest in November and my return so far is 9.17% since Nov, Set it up as I'm self employed and didn't have a pension pushing 40 so thought I'd have something just incase i needed to access the cash but also long term invest

• 
  Matt Connolly (@MattCon90191238) reported 31 minutes ago

  @ikeijeh @MetroUK Until quite recently the City had done a good job of resisting ugly modern towers (with the exception of Natwest Tower). And then suddenly in the early 00s the gloves were off and it became a free for all. Was this down to any one individual?