Sky outages and service status in Cumbria, England
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
- Sky generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Cumbria, including 0 direct reports.
Sky offers satellite television service as well as broadband internet and home phone service. Sky also operates a pay-TV service, including the Sky Sports channel which broadcasts Premier League games, which are also availble on the Sky Go video streaming service.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Cumbria, England
The chart below shows the number of Sky reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Cumbria, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Sky. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Sky Issues Reports Near Cumbria, England
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Cumbria and nearby locations:
-
jon davidson (@davidson_jon) reported from Clifton, England@SkySports @btsport what can’t SkyQ record to the end of a baseball game SkyQ only got to 7th innings again last night it’s a joke - pls help
-
A Lake District Chef Confidential. (@MCFC_Narco_Chef) reported from Ambleside, EnglandThe quality of the picture on sky sports red button is absolutely shocking, I'm trying to watch the Forest game... piss poor @SkySports
Sky Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Cpt_Moobs (@cpt_moobs) reported@siddengg @SkyHelpTeam I had nothing but trouble with Sky internet keep it until your contracts up and then bin it off! There are far better companies out there that are available with faster speeds and better customer service!
-
Kingjames (@kingjames_13th) reported@SkySports How is this **** going to protect me from a freak with a semi automatic rifle shooting in all directions
-
Sylvester charles (@Sylvest85787141) reported@thesleektitan @SkySports I'm not an english fan but I admit the fact that england has never lost a single fixture at the world cup to an african side
-
Tubosun Falowo (@precinoti) reportedVAR RECCURING ERRORS: “WHO IS AT FAULT? THE TECHNOLOGY OR PGMOL OFFICIALS?”. I think to unpack this debacle that we have come to normalized as natural occurrence similar to daily human mistakes, errors by PGMOL officials as seen in almost all game week in the EPL, VAR is simply defined as “Video Assisted Referee”. To break this further, it is officiating a football match using technology i.e video replays, images etc to spot obvious and clear errors committed by the on-field human officials usually 4 personnel or actions sanctioned by the rules as fouls that were completely missed by the on-field officials. For VAR to be effective and not seen as in direct conflict or undermining the authorities of the on-field referees, certain parameters of the game state were defined as areas VAR can intervene like DOGSCO, dangerous play, incidents in the penalty box, violent conducts by players and these activities were categorized into 4 major areas i.e goals (and the attacking phase leading to them), penalties (awarded or missed), direct red cards, and mistaken identity. Now that we have defined VAR and clarified the intended use of VAR, how is it possible that a technology deployed to spot clear and obvious errors made by on-field officials somehow end up with recurring errors that lead to controversies, major talking points post-match every week and in most cases deciding the outcome of football matches? I am Arsenal fan so let’s use Arsenal specific VAR incidents as an example. 3 seasons ago at Newcastle, 3 separate incidents and VAR were unable to spot any. One of the incidents was if the ball had crossed the line. Subjective as at that time because VAR had no camera at the corner flag and no spider camera to confirm if the entire ball had crossed the line. Fast track to this season and at Nottingham Forest, a defender clearly used his hand to control the ball from going into corner kick. There was a camera at the corner, and we all saw that deliberate handball. Juxtaposing both incidents, VAR error at Newcastle had been effectively addressed with a camera at the corner at Nottingham Forest but yet outcome was the same. Arsenal this season at Brighton, Arsenal player deliberately holding a Brighton player in the box during an attacking play missed by the referee but no VAR intervention. At Mancity, an Arsenal player engaging in a violent act but was issued a yellow card instead of a red card. Both actions had no VAR error but officials’ wrong interpretation of the Rules and wrong decision. Typically, most OEMs and other manufacturers usually issue a warning and a recall of their products once that notice significant factory defect or recurring manufacturing errors to their products and such products are withdrawn within weeks, months or sometimes within a year. Before doing this, the OEM go through a process of investigation to determine the root cause, issue a notice to their customers and users and proceed to a remedy phase where repairs and replacements are undertaken. The question now is if VAR (technology) is the problem, who are the OEM of EPL VAR and why have no one asked the OEM to undertake this process of stopping this recurring errors? How come none of the media platforms in the UK ever done any kind of hit piece, editorial or investigative journalism on the recurring errors of the technology? Rather, we have an independent panel that review VAR errors, we have a Skysports PGMOL show where the Head of PGMOL do a review of the VAR errors weekly as well as other controversial officiating decisions, we have another Skysports show where ex-referee do a review of VAR good or bad calls, Talksports have similar radio shows, Ex-Referees have podcasts and Youtube Channels talking about VAR errors and we have media platforms doing annual reports like the one done by BBC, The Athletic and now ESPN doing VAR errors and impact on clubs, title races and relegation battles.
-
BIG-CHALA 🌍 (@Domexchalaza20) reported@Spyeyesports1 @SkySports He should hang himself
-
Thomas Findlay (@EseTomFindlay) reported@tbfl141 @SkySports I imagine it is, and that’s a problem. But they would say walking off isn’t the correct response but reporting it to the referee is.
-
football dog (@TrueGrassroot) reported@AlasdairGold When the owners can’t even be bothered to call us by our proper name. It’s like @SkySports never ever, ever addressing us as Tottenham. I don’t see City or United or Gunners in the league table, but we always see Spurs. #MUPPETS
-
Alfred Brailovski (@alfredb15) reported@SkySports For 114 minutes, after taking the lead, Arsenal did all they could to stink the joint with their garbage cowardly football, and then the football gods said, " That's enough with this **** and decided to dump on them....... Thank the gods for saving us....i would rather have Bournemouth represent me
-
macca1B (@IanMacdonald5) reported@SkySportsNews @SkySports Somebody’s getting fired in their recruitment department he’s never a barcelona player.
-
streathamdave (@streathamdave) reported@SkySports Gabriel wasn't unfortunate. He did the thing you should never do and took it leaning back. It was technique not fortune, but obviously a huge amount of pressure.