1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Sky
  4. Outage Map
Sky

Sky Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Sky users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Sky, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Sky users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Sky offers satellite television service as well as broadband internet and home phone service. Sky also operates a pay-TV service, including the Sky Sports channel which broadcasts Premier League games, which are also availble on the Sky Go video streaming service.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Sky Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • General_Melched
    General_Melchett (@General_Melched) reported

    @SkySports So glad i don’t watch F1 anymore. It’s got **** all to do with racing anymore.

  • marsboyle
    marion boyle (@marsboyle) reported

    @SkyUK you now have no human help team🤬 I don't want to talk to a bot it doesn't work for what I want 🤬🤬

  • Loko_Mexakin
    Loko (@Loko_Mexakin) reported

    @Zuffa_Boxing @SkySports @paramountplus All damage only to make $30,000 lol

  • letsgogp
    AndreWick🏎️🏍️🏁 (@letsgogp) reported

    @SkySports the guest on the grid are not obligated to speak to @MBrundleF1 , also you need to get someone with a more likeable personality to do that job, he's rude and entitled. Read the room! #F1 #MonacoGP

  • Hablarbarca
    HablarBarca (@Hablarbarca) reported

    @totalBarca @SkySports Damn!

  • only1validd
    IamVALID (@only1validd) reported

    @Kemakillzzz @SkySports It means if the ball carries the hand of the player to the goal post there is no audience that can shout down the light , even if there is no other dog can given pap, no Matter the decision of VAR everything else is magic ✨🥰🫳🏾

  • wheelzonfire
    Charlotte Murphy (@wheelzonfire) reported

    Is there any issues with sky stream @SkyUK ? It keeps freezing and sound going quite a bit the last day or 2.

  • chandamuba
    Chanda Mubanga (@chandamuba) reported

    @Dan_1927_ @cozierpanda @Andz6_ Martin and Skysports care, the problem isn’t Martin or Kim, the problem is internet culture which broadcasters are trying to tap into, they want “engagement” views, likes, followers etc that’s why they want these moments so bad.

  • mumo_utd
    Mumo UTD (@mumo_utd) reported

    @SkySports I used to hate Gary Cotterill after the Erik ten Haag incident. But to be honest, the guy has passion. Kudos man

  • vella_vision
    @ (@vella_vision) reported

    @SkyFootball @SkySports A bad omen

  • Gerontius1
    G 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 (@Gerontius1) reported

    I really wish @SkySports wouldn’t do their own replays/reviews of umpiring decisions after the batsman has declined to do so himself. What’s the point? It doesn’t help anyone. It’s all shoulda/woulda/coulda.

  • Fred71683465321
    Fred (@Fred71683465321) reported

    @SkySports NMo NBA finals on Sky. WTF - streaming on Prime thru the night. No ability to tape and watch in morning. Prime makes you watch whole repeat with no fast forward. Thanks Sky - pathetic!

  • precinoti
    Tubosun Falowo (@precinoti) reported

    VAR RECCURING ERRORS: “WHO IS AT FAULT? THE TECHNOLOGY OR PGMOL OFFICIALS?”. I think to unpack this debacle that we have come to normalized as natural occurrence similar to daily human mistakes, errors by PGMOL officials as seen in almost all game week in the EPL, VAR is simply defined as “Video Assisted Referee”. To break this further, it is officiating a football match using technology i.e video replays, images etc to spot obvious and clear errors committed by the on-field human officials usually 4 personnel or actions sanctioned by the rules as fouls that were completely missed by the on-field officials. For VAR to be effective and not seen as in direct conflict or undermining the authorities of the on-field referees, certain parameters of the game state were defined as areas VAR can intervene like DOGSCO, dangerous play, incidents in the penalty box, violent conducts by players and these activities were categorized into 4 major areas i.e goals (and the attacking phase leading to them), penalties (awarded or missed), direct red cards, and mistaken identity. Now that we have defined VAR and clarified the intended use of VAR, how is it possible that a technology deployed to spot clear and obvious errors made by on-field officials somehow end up with recurring errors that lead to controversies, major talking points post-match every week and in most cases deciding the outcome of football matches? I am Arsenal fan so let’s use Arsenal specific VAR incidents as an example. 3 seasons ago at Newcastle, 3 separate incidents and VAR were unable to spot any. One of the incidents was if the ball had crossed the line. Subjective as at that time because VAR had no camera at the corner flag and no spider camera to confirm if the entire ball had crossed the line. Fast track to this season and at Nottingham Forest, a defender clearly used his hand to control the ball from going into corner kick. There was a camera at the corner, and we all saw that deliberate handball. Juxtaposing both incidents, VAR error at Newcastle had been effectively addressed with a camera at the corner at Nottingham Forest but yet outcome was the same. Arsenal this season at Brighton, Arsenal player deliberately holding a Brighton player in the box during an attacking play missed by the referee but no VAR intervention. At Mancity, an Arsenal player engaging in a violent act but was issued a yellow card instead of a red card. Both actions had no VAR error but officials’ wrong interpretation of the Rules and wrong decision. Typically, most OEMs and other manufacturers usually issue a warning and a recall of their products once that notice significant factory defect or recurring manufacturing errors to their products and such products are withdrawn within weeks, months or sometimes within a year. Before doing this, the OEM go through a process of investigation to determine the root cause, issue a notice to their customers and users and proceed to a remedy phase where repairs and replacements are undertaken. The question now is if VAR (technology) is the problem, who are the OEM of EPL VAR and why have no one asked the OEM to undertake this process of stopping this recurring errors? How come none of the media platforms in the UK ever done any kind of hit piece, editorial or investigative journalism on the recurring errors of the technology? Rather, we have an independent panel that review VAR errors, we have a Skysports PGMOL show where the Head of PGMOL do a review of the VAR errors weekly as well as other controversial officiating decisions, we have another Skysports show where ex-referee do a review of VAR good or bad calls, Talksports have similar radio shows, Ex-Referees have podcasts and Youtube Channels talking about VAR errors and we have media platforms doing annual reports like the one done by BBC, The Athletic and now ESPN doing VAR errors and impact on clubs, title races and relegation battles.

  • CoiNDosh
    ᕮⲙⲓ𝕣ⲁⲧⲉ🛡️ (@CoiNDosh) reported

    @SkySportsNews England is their own worst enemy; wtf is wrong with @SkySports just at the eve of world week you’re creating a useless headline let the manager cook. What matters is the team not an individual. Most generation will forget the names of those won it but not the country who did.

  • LDingbobga
    Cyril Godwin. (@LDingbobga) reported

    @goalsside @SkySports They want to cover the problem they have with their goalkeeper

Check Current Status