Post Office outages and service status in Welwyn Garden City, England
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Full Outage Map
- Post Office generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Welwyn Garden City, including 0 direct reports.
Post Office offers home phone and broadband internet service, as well as financial services including savings, loans and credit cards.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Welwyn Garden City, England
The chart below shows the number of Post Office reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Welwyn Garden City, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Post Office. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Post Office Issues Reports Near Welwyn Garden City, England
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Welwyn Garden City and nearby locations:
-
Robin Fawcett (@Greenwoodworker) reported from Waltham Abbey, England@PostOffice @RoyalMailHelp Thanks for that but I already have & we are NOT supposed to receive any of the crap distributed by the Post Office. However the poor sod delivering it is desperate to lighten the weight of their over filled bag of rubbish so put it through the letter box anyway!😬
-
NorthSouthgirl (@sarahpearson80) reported from St Albans, England@PostOffice Hi guy's can you please the Post Office at Sandridge is having an going on with parcels their can't give me my parcel as the barcode isn't working the machine is saying invalid. Its shocking service when you have paid for something.
-
Paul Scully MP #StayAlertSaveLives (@scullyp) reported from London Colney, England@CWUPostmasters @PostOffice @NFSP_UK Thanks for raising the issue but no I didn't consult with @NFSP_UK before announcing the independent review but having had a scheduled meeting with them this week, clearly it was an important topic of conversation
-
Judit Szarka (@Judit_Sz) reported from Enfield Lock, England@PostOffice utterly ridiculous that your staff won’t allow me to collect my #amazonprime order with my bank card and email confirmation. First and last time I tried to use this service.
-
Joyce Benaich (@JoyceBenaich) reported from London Colney, England@USPS @USPSHelp I sent my US ballot on the 7th of October from the UK via track and trace international delivery. @PostOffice has confirmed it’s left the UK to a USPS facility but there is no confirmation on my tracking that it has arrived. Can you urgently help???
-
Also (@trav_al) reported from St Albans, England@PostOffice Oh I know that number by heart. Would've replied sooner, but it's gone down. Again. So didn't see the tweet.
-
sara pittack (@sarapittack) reported from Barnet, England@PostOffice @BootstrapCook So much excellent advice from the Post Office to help us save money. An extra tip is to only use free email to send messages as oppose to using stamps to send letters
-
David Moritz (@davidmoritz) reported from Harpenden, England@PostOffice what is wrong with the Harpenden Post Office. Total lack of staff and slow slow slow. No one is in any rush. Always a queue of at least 8 people. Oh and the self serve machines have been out for days
-
Mark Graham (@MarkGra11601194) reported from Hertfordshire, England@NFTSAlumni @PostOffice A lot of the comments on here really do show why it is necessary for @PostOffice and other large bodies to show support and solidarity like this. If you cannot see what is positive about this then the message was probably meant for you.
-
Barbara (@BallardsLane) reported from Barnet, England@PostOffice And the National Health Service? They use 🌈 now.
Post Office Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Louisa ⭐️⭐️💙💙🏆 (@pawseygirl) reportedI feel sorry for the guy who works in the @PostOffice in Walthamstow, he is always very polite and efficient, but always working on his own with a queue out the door. I don’t know why they don’t give him help
-
Josh Smith 🇬🇧🏳️🌈🏴 (@JoshSmith1979T) reported@twasthentisnow @lily_lna @PostOffice She’s not an employee, she is a customer wtf
-
hello (@Merry_Rissa) reported@twasthentisnow @lily_lna @PostOffice It definitely read like she was a customer otherwise she wouldn’t have put “post office staff” cos they would be her colleagues
-
Doherty J (@juliedoherty29) reported@ajthfc @PostOffice @lily_lna No I wasn’t but I did get the wrong end of the stick, so there is that. Anyway my bad.
-
Sandy van Deventer (@1deeds) reported@lily_lna @PostOffice She's a bloody customer ffs!
-
Barbara Walsh (@Barbara18648292) reported@fem_mb @lily_lna @PostOffice She was on her way to a reception and realised she had not posted a parcel with a deadline. So she tried to drop it off on her way. Note, a guy in a ***** vest and cut off shorts showing acres of leg would not be treated so badly. It's women these people have a problem with.
-
Artur Nadolny (@ArturNadol7566) reportedPOST OFFICE REWRITES ITS OWN SCANDAL I was reading through the Post Office Process Review page on the corporate @PostOffice website when one paragraph was cought my attention... The PPR, was set up after the Common Issues Judgment in March 2019, the ruling that came out of Alan Bates and others versus Post Office Limited and first forced Post Office to admit its Horizon accounting system was unreliable and that postmasters had been wrongly blamed for shortfalls the system itself created. "Since the Common Issues Judgment in March 2019, we have carried out work across the business to identify products, policies or processes that may have caused financial loss to Postmasters because of the way they were designed or delivered." The background section on the page says Post Office has carried out work to identify products, policies or processes that may have caused financial loss to postmasters because of the way they were designed or delivered. That phrasing removes Post Office as the party doing the designing and delivering. The losses did not just happen because of how something was designed, Post Office designed it. "We wish to put this right in a straightforward and transparent way, and we have therefore set up the Post Office Process Review to provide financial redress for current and former Postmasters who were impacted." A line further down says Post Office wishes to put this right in a straightforward and transparent way. That reads as voluntary goodwill. What actually happened is a court judgment forced Post Office to admit fault after years of fighting the litigation that proved it, and the PPR exists because of that judgment, not out of an independent wish to be transparent. "You may be aware that there have also been other redress schemes available for people impacted by the Horizon IT Scandal. You can submit a request to the Post Office Process Review whether or not you have separately received a payment or have a case in progress through any of those other redress schemes." Then comes the paragraph that caught my attention most. It tells readers there have also been other redress schemes available for people impacted by the Horizon IT Scandal, and that a postmaster can apply to the PPR whether or not they have already received a payment through one of those other schemes. Read on its own, with no background on the case, this makes Post Office sound like an intermediary. Something called the Horizon IT Scandal happened to postmasters, and Post Office is now helping them access redress for it, alongside other schemes that also exist to help. Post Office built and ran the Horizon system. Post Office prosecuted postmasters using data from that system. Post Office fought the litigation that eventually proved the system was flawed, for years, at public expense, before the judgment forced its hand. The redress schemes named here, including the PPR itself, exist because Post Office caused the losses they compensate. The page also treats the PPR issues and the Horizon IT Scandal as two separate subjects, one involving products, policies and processes, the other a scandal that happened elsewhere, to other people, through other schemes. A postmaster or anybody else reading this without prior context could reasonably conclude that Post Office is a well-meaning administrator cleaning up a mess it did not create. Most people who land on this page are not journalists or campaigners. They are current or former postmasters, or their family members, trying to work out if they are owed money and how to ask for it, and many will not have followed the litigation, the public inquiry, or the years of reporting that established what actually happened. For that reader, the framing on this page is the information. If it tells them Post Office is helping victims of a scandal rather than admitting to causing one, that is what they will take away, and it will shape how much scrutiny they think the process deserves. Post Office has spent years controlling how this story gets told, first by denying there was a problem at all, then by fighting compensation claims, and now by writing its own compensation scheme in language that keeps the institution at arm's length from what it did. The wording on this page is small. The pattern is not.
-
JohnnyUltimamente (@Underthecosh1) reported@lily_lna @PostOffice The post office? WTF. Bunch of hijab wearers there or summink ?
-
Alison Mac (@AlisonM39525362) reported@twasthentisnow @lily_lna @PostOffice She is a customer.
-
shanti (@imshanti_01) reportedA disabled woman went to the postoffice to post important documents but was turned away citing server down. 💔 This is the situation even in the era of 5G. Imagine that sometimes the server is down, how far the world has progressed and this is it. The woman kept saying, Sir, how will I come again, I have come with great difficulty, but the post office people did not listen to her at all. They said the time is over, should we come tomorrow? These people could not understand the pain of a disabled woman. Couldn't you have taken her documents and posted them? Was the poor girl so helpless and still you didn't help her? Please tell me whether action should be taken against such postmaster or not.