1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Sky
  4. Burford
Sky

Sky outages and service status in Burford, England

Some problems detected

Users are reporting problems related to: internet, wi-fi and tv.

Full Outage Map
  • Sky generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Burford, including 0 direct reports.
  • The most common problems reported in this area mention Internet and Wi-fi.
  • 75% Internet (75%)
  • 25% Wi-fi (25%)

Sky offers satellite television service as well as broadband internet and home phone service. Sky also operates a pay-TV service, including the Sky Sports channel which broadcasts Premier League games, which are also availble on the Sky Go video streaming service.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Burford, England

The chart below shows the number of Sky reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Burford, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

June 8: Problems at Sky

Sky is having issues since 05:20 PM GMT. Are you also affected? Leave a message in the comments section!

Live Outage Map Near Burford, England

The most recent Sky outage reports came from the following cities: Faringdon, and Witney.

CityProblem TypeReport Time
Faringdon Internet 13 days ago
Faringdon Internet 16 days ago

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Sky Issues Reports Near Burford, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Burford and nearby locations:

  • petestevuk
    peter stevenson (@petestevuk) reported from Faringdon, England

    @SkyHelpTeam any news on the Swindon outage and why I live in Oxford with a SN postcode is mine effected?

  • gooner1947
    Peter N (@gooner1947) reported from Fairford, England

    @Timjimted @SkySports He's rubbish. Why he never booked Mané for that blatant dive is beyond me.

  • roller1004
    Gary Rowles (@roller1004) reported from Witney, England

    @SkySports The worst top order we have had in years...better batsman in the commentary box...

  • ChefWayner
    ChefWayner (@ChefWayner) reported from Bourton-on-the-Water, England

    @SkyHelpTeam can you advise if there are service issues for GL54 2..?

  • bwoodbridge33
    Brad woodbridge (@bwoodbridge33) reported from Witney, England

    @MuttleyLD @SkySports As a neutral I never got the impression Tyler dislikes any team. But if he did, maybe it’s because Carragher is so obviously biased for Liverpool that he’s going out of his way to level it up. I don’t believe that for one second but it would be hilarious if true

  • bwoodbridge33
    Brad woodbridge (@bwoodbridge33) reported from Witney, England

    @andywa7kins @SkySports @Shutterstock @GeoffCameron @arangelz Might as well hang on a week as there’ll probably be 3 more by the time we play Stoke😂

  • shrekhamera
    andrew hamera (@shrekhamera) reported from Stow-on-the-Wold, England

    @SkyHelpTeam hi I’m having trouble downloading programs on my sky box my internet is fine so it’s not that

  • Shazyb123
    Sharon Broadhurst (@Shazyb123) reported from Witney, England

    @SkyHelpTeam I want to get rid of movies as quite frankly they are rubbish and kids I never asked for that and hd.

  • Forest_and_F1
    Edward Todd #NFFC (@Forest_and_F1) reported from Ducklington, England

    **** @SkySports technical issue. Come one !!!!! Stop them waffling **** !!!! #NFFC

  • Shazyb123
    Sharon Broadhurst (@Shazyb123) reported from Witney, England

    @SkyHelpTeam No no you must be joking I have tried calling it's a joke and let's talk about the white noise that happens after waiting 11.2 mins every time I call. To make me hang up. Either get someone to message me or call or your gone.

  • neilrobinson_88
    Neil 🇬🇧 (@neilrobinson_88) reported from Carterton, England

    @SkyHelpTeam Hi Sky, was shocked to see my direct debit had increased to £44 and taken out of my account this morning. Not happy. This is really expensive for Sky without any packages. Please get it back to what it was or I will cancel altogether. Thanks. Please advise.

  • roller1004
    Gary Rowles (@roller1004) reported from Witney, England

    @KroenkeOut21 @SkySports And swapped out one international superstar for another one...not really interested in the detail, its the pundits stupid comments that annoy...

Sky Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • jeremyideal
    Jeremy (@jeremyideal) reported

    @SkySports I'm bored already. The constant media crap. Who cares? Wait for the game and find out. And whoever isn't picked, we don't need a 60min piece on why he wasn't picked, and what we're missing.

  • AFC_Murph
    AFC_Murph (@AFC_Murph) reported

    @femooafc At some point the pendulum has to swing the other way SkySports, TalkSport, and the rage bait online has to get so boring that even the mouth breathers will want something else The first movers on real content will hopefully kill this **** trend once and for all

  • funnycnut
    Apple Account (@funnycnut) reported

    @VRoonaldo @SkySports ******* idiot. It's an in-house production. Don't let the facts get in the way of your cryarsing.

  • Supersvanen1
    Michael Svane King of swans (@Supersvanen1) reported

    @The_Cannon49 They're the worst of the worst. Skysports is a close second, but Talkshite will always have my unadulterated hate!

  • shumel10
    shumel (@shumel10) reported

    @Zuffa_Boxing @SkySports @paramountplus Where's the crowd? Dana u fraud u can't promote ****

  • precinoti
    Tubosun Falowo (@precinoti) reported

    VAR RECCURING ERRORS: “WHO IS AT FAULT? THE TECHNOLOGY OR PGMOL OFFICIALS?”. I think to unpack this debacle that we have come to normalized as natural occurrence similar to daily human mistakes, errors by PGMOL officials as seen in almost all game week in the EPL, VAR is simply defined as “Video Assisted Referee”. To break this further, it is officiating a football match using technology i.e video replays, images etc to spot obvious and clear errors committed by the on-field human officials usually 4 personnel or actions sanctioned by the rules as fouls that were completely missed by the on-field officials. For VAR to be effective and not seen as in direct conflict or undermining the authorities of the on-field referees, certain parameters of the game state were defined as areas VAR can intervene like DOGSCO, dangerous play, incidents in the penalty box, violent conducts by players and these activities were categorized into 4 major areas i.e goals (and the attacking phase leading to them), penalties (awarded or missed), direct red cards, and mistaken identity. Now that we have defined VAR and clarified the intended use of VAR, how is it possible that a technology deployed to spot clear and obvious errors made by on-field officials somehow end up with recurring errors that lead to controversies, major talking points post-match every week and in most cases deciding the outcome of football matches? I am Arsenal fan so let’s use Arsenal specific VAR incidents as an example. 3 seasons ago at Newcastle, 3 separate incidents and VAR were unable to spot any. One of the incidents was if the ball had crossed the line. Subjective as at that time because VAR had no camera at the corner flag and no spider camera to confirm if the entire ball had crossed the line. Fast track to this season and at Nottingham Forest, a defender clearly used his hand to control the ball from going into corner kick. There was a camera at the corner, and we all saw that deliberate handball. Juxtaposing both incidents, VAR error at Newcastle had been effectively addressed with a camera at the corner at Nottingham Forest but yet outcome was the same. Arsenal this season at Brighton, Arsenal player deliberately holding a Brighton player in the box during an attacking play missed by the referee but no VAR intervention. At Mancity, an Arsenal player engaging in a violent act but was issued a yellow card instead of a red card. Both actions had no VAR error but officials’ wrong interpretation of the Rules and wrong decision. Typically, most OEMs and other manufacturers usually issue a warning and a recall of their products once that notice significant factory defect or recurring manufacturing errors to their products and such products are withdrawn within weeks, months or sometimes within a year. Before doing this, the OEM go through a process of investigation to determine the root cause, issue a notice to their customers and users and proceed to a remedy phase where repairs and replacements are undertaken. The question now is if VAR (technology) is the problem, who are the OEM of EPL VAR and why have no one asked the OEM to undertake this process of stopping this recurring errors? How come none of the media platforms in the UK ever done any kind of hit piece, editorial or investigative journalism on the recurring errors of the technology? Rather, we have an independent panel that review VAR errors, we have a Skysports PGMOL show where the Head of PGMOL do a review of the VAR errors weekly as well as other controversial officiating decisions, we have another Skysports show where ex-referee do a review of VAR good or bad calls, Talksports have similar radio shows, Ex-Referees have podcasts and Youtube Channels talking about VAR errors and we have media platforms doing annual reports like the one done by BBC, The Athletic and now ESPN doing VAR errors and impact on clubs, title races and relegation battles.

  • BratArmy
    Jan Army Brat 🇬🇧 🦖 🎗️ (@BratArmy) reported

    @QcWynter @SkyUK @SkyHelpTeam Oh wow good job it didn’t do any more damage.

  • i7ml163992
    qezmeta (@i7ml163992) reported

    @totalBarca @SkySports He won't come to ****

  • ubysilas
    Ubong Silas (@ubysilas) reported

    @theMadridZone @SkySports Arsenal are in trouble

  • TheNewsHound_
    TheNewsHound (@TheNewsHound_) reported

    @SkySports he was never funny, and still is not.