NatWest status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours in Tolworth, England

The chart below shows the number of NatWest reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Tolworth, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

NatWest Issues Reports Near Tolworth, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Tolworth and nearby locations:

• 
  Bert (@XBerts) reported 5 minutes ago from Lambeth, England

  @NatWest_Help absolutely appalling service today at NatWest telephone banking. Have been waiting for over one hour to get a replacement card. Get transferred to random people and now cut off! WTF !!

• 
  💙 Stacey Killon (@beady_stace) reported 7 minutes ago from Worcester Park, England

  Not particularly impressed with my local @NatWest_Help branch today in trying to open a trust fund. “It’s all on the app” - what about actually providing actual customer service? 😩 #natwest

• 
  Maggie - wear a mask 💙🏳️‍🌈🌱 (@maggieinlondon) reported 10 minutes ago from Wandsworth, England

  @carolecadwalla I found a NatWest debit card for Natalie West (thought it was a test card) but took it anyway to a NatWest branch and it turned out she was a real customer!

• 
  Geoff Whitehouse (@ByGeoffW) reported 21 minutes ago from Croydon, England

  For all the chat about how incumbents are lagging - NatWest is showing how it should be done. Deep Innovation, working with regulators, delivering new services at a scale others can only dream of. Let’s see if that forces some of the laggards to - finally - act.

• 
  Joanne Timms (@LdnCinders) reported 33 minutes ago from Croydon, England

  @sainsburys I just said they reported no issues! I literally just messaged natwest themselves. I'll shop elsewhere as every other website is processing payments via visa fine apart from yours. Who knew it this hard to order soap powder and bleach?

• 
  Miguel Viegas (@miguelagviegas) reported 41 minutes ago from Wandsworth, England

  @Brightstar have just tried to call you through Natwest to get help to register my phone but instead someone picked up my call and apparently a private call as well, and I was left hanging with no answer tor several minutes until I gave up. Not a great experience

• 
  nadia holmes (@nadiaholmesx) reported 44 minutes ago from Wandsworth, England

  almost two weeks without online banking bc Natwest are **** and dont cater for people who have had their phone stolen ughhhhhh

• 
  Niamh O'Reilly 😷 (@thatniamh) reported 51 minutes ago from Hammersmith, England

  Under zero circumstances activate biometric approval on the NatWest app you have been warned. It’s ****

• 
  Jack Head (@JackHead95) reported 59 minutes ago from Richmond, England

  ‘You’re suggesting I take out a loan, to deal with a cash flow issue resulting from NatWest’s incompetence?’ ‘No, I didn’t say that. The lending team can do all sorts of things’ Right… 11/

NatWest Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Tariff Turnip (@MetaverseGamma) reported 1 minute ago

  @mrsDugskullery @p0Intyhead @LBC What exactly is that you think happens when a bank collapses? It’s certainly not just the shareholders that lose out, if Brown had let Natwest collapse they would have had to insure £2 trillion of customer deposits, something tells me that might have cost more than a bailout.

• 
  Big Jez (@statikjerry) reported 4 minutes ago

  @nuhre_ So doing something illegal is what you support? Genuinely retarded? I don’t like my NatWest terms and conditions so maybe I’ll just go burn the building down because what else will make them listen? See how retarded that logic is

• 
  IKR~ÓluKayòde (@ray_kay9) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Omojuwa My wife with a Natwest customer and called him by name, a Brit said pls refer to me with respect,not by name! First he's old enough to be her father, he's not just a random customer and for the fact my Mrs is an Nigerian, he knows there's lot of respect from where we came from!

• 
  Connie (@ConnieSherge) reported 10 minutes ago

  @12beattiestp @PedeJo__ @isabelrosesss this is correct. the bank is natwest (rbs) nobody has access to anything and everything is scrambled outside of production. i dont think theres even a fat unix wizard who has access to read production, from what i remember working there

• 
  Jim Waltzon (@wa1tz3r1) reported 10 minutes ago

  @Apple how can I tell my cards apart in Apple Pay? I have 4 @NatWest cards, all frustratingly identical. Learning the numbers is not an option, as at leat one card number will change every six months! Help me please!? There must be a better way!

• 
  Lorraine Morris (@MLorrM) reported 12 minutes ago

  In the case of Perks v NatWest Markets Plc (evidence given around 2022), Mr Neil Graham — a GRG director, chartered accountant and experienced banker — was cross-examined under oath about the bank’s RMP credit system entries for swap-related credit lines / contingent obligations (often referred to as CLU – Credit Line Utilisation). Key exchanges reported in the materials include: 🔹Mr Graham accepted that the credit-line entry on the RMP system represented the client’s contingent obligation. 🔹Mr Graham agreed it was a factor the bank used when considering in loan-to-value calculations for the overall connection. 🔹When asked whether it could push a connection over a loan-to-value ratio covenant, he answered (subject to market movements) yes. 🔹He further accepted that this could ultimately lead to the connection being transferred into GRG. 🔹Mr Graham is experienced and the testimony is truthful; however, as happened in Ireland - bank’s counsel later attempted to “distance the bank from this evidence in closing submissions”. 🔹Surprise, surprise but bank’s counsel is categorically misleading the Court. 🔹They characterised Graham’s answers as given “on the hoof,” - said it was not his specialist area and submitted that he was wrong on the LTV impact point. 🔹They argued the bank did not accept that the CLU had the effect claimed and that there was no duty to volunteer information about it to the customer. 🔹This was what bank counsel is required to do to keep the charade going and that they cavalierly do so is a scandal in itself. 🔹Mr Graham’s testimony exists and is on the public record, as circulated by campaigners and referenced in related presentations. 🔹So, a senior bank director & chartered accountant with a GRG/risk-adjacent role did accept under oath that the credit line could cause or contribute to an LTV breach and subsequent transfer into GRG. 🔹This is rather obvious and is in fact why the products were sold in the first instance - as confirmed by numerous insiders. 🔹NatWest’s formal position in that case (and more generally) has been to treat such lines as “internal risk measures” rather than customer-facing hard liabilities that automatically breach covenants in the way alleged, and to reject the broader fraud characterisation. But that would be their formal position would it not? When billions of euros is at stake? 🔹Meanwhile customers faced enormous break costs & this fact alone is wholly inconsistent with the characterisation of the credit line as a purely internal risk measure. 🔹It is however consistent with the reality, which is that the bank had booked (and later crystallised) an exposure against their customers and the credit line had been concealed. 🔹That bank counsel filed pleadings that falsely characterised these structures as just fixing an interest rate or just ordinary fixed-rate loans, facilitating the burying of the misrepresentations under layers of legal process - is a further scandal - akin to that whereby the lawyers who managed to lock up innocent sub-postmasters on foot of unsound evidence. 🔹The result for Irish SMEs duped by theses practices was a systematic extraction of value from those SMEs - while the guilty institution and its lawyers ensured that accountability remained permanently out of reach. @ArturNadol7566 @Wftproof

• 
  Srijan (@ImSrijanG) reported 13 minutes ago

  @prasannalara algorithm podunga sir. Any chance of India chasing this down? Giving Natwest Final 2002 vibes

• 
  jackduk (@jackduk1) reported 13 minutes ago

  @DebtFreeBy30UK I'm no expert, but it might make sense to pay minimum on your cards, throw everything at Monzo, then MBNA, Barclays then NatWest. Don't bother investing with this much debt. Squeeze some out of your weekly spend, even 30 quid a week will help. Move debt around to 0% early.

• 
  Mark (@MTrad25) reported 13 minutes ago

  Friday 31 July — what’s moving The week ends with the cleanest illustration of the new rule anyone could ask for. Apple beat on almost everything. Revenue $109.4bn, +16%. iPhone $54.25bn, +22% — its best ever June quarter. EPS $2.02 against $1.89 expected. The stock fell after hours, on guidance. Amazon raised full-year capex to $220bn — a number that would have been punished a fortnight ago — and jumped ~8%, because AWS grew 36.7%, its fastest in over four years. Microsoft up, Meta down, Amazon up, Apple down. The market is neither rewarding AI spending nor punishing it. It’s grading proof. Note the casualty: for two weeks Apple was the hedge, capex at 1.8% of revenue making it the place to hide from spending anxiety. On the night the spenders got paid, abstaining stopped earning a premium. Asia took the same message and amplified it violently. The KOSPI rose as much as 17% — its best day on record. Samsung and SK Hynix up near 30%. Taiwan +7%, Nikkei +5%. Now the number that matters: the KOSPI is still down ~25% for July, its worst month since 1997. A 17% day inside that is not recovery. It’s a market with the leverage stripped out of it — Korean authorities spent the week reining in leveraged products that had wiped out retail savings. And the FX story is the week’s thesis in miniature. Japan and Korea intervened jointly on Thursday — unprecedented, with the yen near a 40-year low. Then the BoJ held rates on Friday and the yen went straight back to 160.69. Coordinated intervention by two states bought roughly one session. Nothing about the rate differential changed, so nothing about the yen did. Which rhymes with the central banks. The Fed’s statement was near-identical to June’s — one verb and three dissenters — and Warsh signalled a step back from forward guidance. The BoE held 3.75% on a 6-3 vote, three hawks where two were expected, then Bailey immediately told reporters not to read it as edging towards a hike. September hike odds fell to 40% from above 50%. The bond market’s answer: long-end US yields near 19-year highs while the short end eased. A steepener built on doubt that anyone can anchor inflation. In London: the FTSE 100 touched a record 10,979.60 intra-day then closed down 0.1%. Rolls-Royce led, +6%, on H1 operating profit up 17% to £2.42bn. Today: NatWest, Taylor Wimpey, ITV, plus Exxon and Chevron. FTSE futures +0.4%. This was the week guidance died. Warsh won’t give it. Bailey disowned his own committee’s. Two governments spent reserves defending currencies and got a day. And Apple’s forecast cost it more than a record quarter earned. Everyone is being marked on evidence now.

• 
  Teds (@Tedtalks13) reported 16 minutes ago

  @SecGenNATO in these @s that aren’t to be declared in another function. 1. What date did that energy firm sign a declaration that has specific requirements to be a NATO partner 2. What date did the cpr 7 become crown stamped sealed. 3. What dates did the directors change in uk versus eu main AGM board I have a list of merger acquisitions across uk in the pensions, insurances (including my business insurance tapped up of falcon yet the banking direct into HCC international that remained in place all through partial legal drafting while the initial public sector money was positioned for the demo of my software prototype The banks tsb no reason in their divorce with Lloyd’s; Lloyd’s business 2017 not notifying closure of account; of three partnership managers inside the bank of three different companies; my start up handed defined beyond the “risk assessment of the innovation. Partnering to further develop on the point of rejecting 100k of additional public sector money” (I rejected with ******* good reason) 2017/2018 there was a positioning error and error transfer of Lower court into not civil was positioned for intellectual court. 2018 had discussion re moving the asset of the house I rented (that had first entry in March 2015 while I was in cork for three days and my tsb banking removed off my desk in how I visually place materials in what is suppose to of been a secure save private letting). My dog was safe that short period as it was with a female and her dog. IN THAT period I was in business courts Northampton on written using Supreme Court high seat colour and symbols on documents; more than 13 case numbers (while others thought I was in some kind of gym bet! Get a life idiots) In that period I had also processed beyond the origin start of the system restructure; before I changed from virgin media WiFi domestic to ee business broadband; The click on inotes of the demo was clicked on the iPhone 6 that became a dispute in the old bullring of apple upstairs and VM downstairs where I asked for them to collect the phone after apple technical stated the cloud photos had been breached; (deleting the beginning of my work and my personal pictures of my not a pet.) apple Provided myself a new phone based on that. I then purchased an iPhone OFF AMAZON; where the ip of that and serial is on the box. these boxes and phones have gone missing however the iCloud records all that;; including the signalling through VM platforms (that lease from Bt ) ee platforms ( that became owned byBT and not a matter of bribery to use “all claims) and then the BT business that I kept running post eviction for the reason of security before they developed after many emails And calls from me (sound headset ) the vulnerable protection function they have developed. In these is another service level agreements that’s appearing in text words in NhS and charity banners. I recieved an email recent from NatWest claiming on the 1st of October 2026 to the October of 2025 that they can close an account if they choose fo no reason; Within these dates is Covid two credit ref agencies and three brokerage platforms Pre being procured into the comp house and dwp integration of proof and verifications. In all this period there is no social life, yet a lot of documents wrote and attachments in emails. I am aware that in uk some platforms that claim to contact manage can clone a companies email or persons and respond while the origin never receives the origin; I am being beyond mentally abused over the efficiency in the reason of enhanced . I have a legal right to be recompensed to live in a hotel be near my doctors and do small amounts that become and can become global work tasks What’s the issue; as the local aspect caused damages for everyone a small handle of people