1. Home
  2. โฏ
  3. Companies
  4. โฏ
  5. Post Office
  6. โฏ
  7. Wallsend
Post Office

Post Office outages and service status in Wallsend, England

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • Post Office generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Wallsend, including 0 direct reports.

Post Office offers home phone and broadband internet service, as well as financial services including savings, loans and credit cards.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Wallsend, England

The chart below shows the number of Post Office reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Wallsend, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Post Office. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Post Office Issues Reports Near Wallsend, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Wallsend and nearby locations:

  • AndersonKennya
    ken anderson (@AndersonKennya) reported from Blyth, England

    @PostOffice we have been PO broadband and phone customers for 12 years.we elected to go paperless and pay our bill using the phone(but)it never works,tells us we owe nothing!we attempted to sort it by talking to you but..still the same..Help

  • chrisbird9
    chris bird (@chrisbird9) reported from Newcastle upon Tyne, England

    @PostOffice Not working since Saturday

  • frenchdave69
    French Dave ๐Ÿค•๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ (@frenchdave69) reported from Blakelaw, England

    @PostOffice Why have the five expensive self-service machines in your Newcastle Northumberland St branch been switched off all week? This is my third trip as the queues have been too long all week. I only want to weigh and post a couple of things!

  • geordie_jem
    Jemma Cross (@geordie_jem) reported from Hebburn, England

    @PostOffice excellent service from the lady at Newcastle Northumberland Street store today trying to help me sort my car tax out ๐Ÿ˜

  • reecelyonssound
    Reece Lyons (@reecelyonssound) reported from South Shields, England

    @PostOffice Carden street branch, south shields is a constant disappointment. Rude staff, making up their own rules as per when they will accept parcels, and now not complying with measures to ensure a covid-safe space. I hate to be that person, but it's not the first issue.

  • Mrs_Moir
    Lee-Ann Moir (@Mrs_Moir) reported from Dunston, England

    @NFSP_UK need to be held accountable for their complicity in the @PostOffice treatment of sub- postmasters - they are just as guilty as they did nothing to help members instead they protected the post office.

  • bigjohnuk_john
    john mclauchlin (@bigjohnuk_john) reported from Wallsend, England

    @PostOffice really disappointed, checked your exchange rate for dollars today $1.27 but was only given $1.22 in store, that's almost airport rates! asked for immediate refund but refused, to top it currency not in stock - poor customer service today

  • ProjectSapper
    Sapper Project (@ProjectSapper) reported from Seaham, England

    Had to write a cheque the other day, no idea where my cheque book is so got a postal order instead. ยฃ35 postal order cost me ยฃ39.80!!!! WTF!! Why does it cost so much? Surely a ยฃ35 postal order should be ยฃ35 or something like a ยฃ1 processing fee max @PostOffice #ripoff

  • prlumley
    Peter Lumley (@prlumley) reported from Whickham, England

    Well done in the Customer Services stakes:NOT. ? Is it @mccolls ? or is it @morrison who arbitrarily close their NE16 local @postoffice because today the (understaffed anyway) "convenience" store ain't got enough workers. THE "sprat to catch a mackerel" ruse short of bait now?

  • jamesbuffyboyle
    James Buffy Boyle (@jamesbuffyboyle) reported from Whitley Bay, England

    @PostOffice I cant get onto your website to make a payment? It says: โ€œService Unavailable HTTP Error 503. The service is unavailable.โ€ Can you please DM me? Thanks.

  • chrisbird9
    chris bird (@chrisbird9) reported from Newcastle upon Tyne, England

    Anybody having problems with @PostOffice broadband

  • IanVizzi
    Ian Vizzi (@IanVizzi) reported from Ryton, England

    Please answer @RoyalMail @RoyalMailHelp @PostOffice @PostOfficeNews need HELP

  • vitosauras
    H (@vitosauras) reported from Gateshead, England

    @PostOffice Yes, it's just down the street and they were closed at 3pm.

  • chlological
    chlo (@chlological) reported from South Shields, England

    @PostOffice Itโ€™s been going on since before COVID. The normally post office was shut down and put into the other store to make things quicker, but itโ€™s definitely not.

  • IanVizzi
    Ian Vizzi (@IanVizzi) reported from Ryton, England

    @C_Albrecht89 @RoyalMail Iโ€™ll be using @Parcel2go after lockdown, ATM theyโ€™re way too slow. 2 weeks to deliver to recipients from point of collection so slinging 25 large letters in local village post box is all I can do. No way am I standing in age long @postoffice queue for proof of postage receipts.

Post Office Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • Camtea
    Flo-native (@Camtea) reported

    @twasthentisnow @lily_lna @PostOffice Poor Beth. Opened her mouth and confirmed the fool

  • ArturNadol7566
    Artur Nadolny (@ArturNadol7566) reported

    POST OFFICE REWRITES ITS OWN SCANDAL I was reading through the Post Office Process Review page on the corporate @PostOffice website when one paragraph was cought my attention... The PPR, was set up after the Common Issues Judgment in March 2019, the ruling that came out of Alan Bates and others versus Post Office Limited and first forced Post Office to admit its Horizon accounting system was unreliable and that postmasters had been wrongly blamed for shortfalls the system itself created. "Since the Common Issues Judgment in March 2019, we have carried out work across the business to identify products, policies or processes that may have caused financial loss to Postmasters because of the way they were designed or delivered." The background section on the page says Post Office has carried out work to identify products, policies or processes that may have caused financial loss to postmasters because of the way they were designed or delivered. That phrasing removes Post Office as the party doing the designing and delivering. The losses did not just happen because of how something was designed, Post Office designed it. "We wish to put this right in a straightforward and transparent way, and we have therefore set up the Post Office Process Review to provide financial redress for current and former Postmasters who were impacted." A line further down says Post Office wishes to put this right in a straightforward and transparent way. That reads as voluntary goodwill. What actually happened is a court judgment forced Post Office to admit fault after years of fighting the litigation that proved it, and the PPR exists because of that judgment, not out of an independent wish to be transparent. "You may be aware that there have also been other redress schemes available for people impacted by the Horizon IT Scandal. You can submit a request to the Post Office Process Review whether or not you have separately received a payment or have a case in progress through any of those other redress schemes." Then comes the paragraph that caught my attention most. It tells readers there have also been other redress schemes available for people impacted by the Horizon IT Scandal, and that a postmaster can apply to the PPR whether or not they have already received a payment through one of those other schemes. Read on its own, with no background on the case, this makes Post Office sound like an intermediary. Something called the Horizon IT Scandal happened to postmasters, and Post Office is now helping them access redress for it, alongside other schemes that also exist to help. Post Office built and ran the Horizon system. Post Office prosecuted postmasters using data from that system. Post Office fought the litigation that eventually proved the system was flawed, for years, at public expense, before the judgment forced its hand. The redress schemes named here, including the PPR itself, exist because Post Office caused the losses they compensate. The page also treats the PPR issues and the Horizon IT Scandal as two separate subjects, one involving products, policies and processes, the other a scandal that happened elsewhere, to other people, through other schemes. A postmaster or anybody else reading this without prior context could reasonably conclude that Post Office is a well-meaning administrator cleaning up a mess it did not create. Most people who land on this page are not journalists or campaigners. They are current or former postmasters, or their family members, trying to work out if they are owed money and how to ask for it, and many will not have followed the litigation, the public inquiry, or the years of reporting that established what actually happened. For that reader, the framing on this page is the information. If it tells them Post Office is helping victims of a scandal rather than admitting to causing one, that is what they will take away, and it will shape how much scrutiny they think the process deserves. Post Office has spent years controlling how this story gets told, first by denying there was a problem at all, then by fighting compensation claims, and now by writing its own compensation scheme in language that keeps the institution at arm's length from what it did. The wording on this page is small. The pattern is not.

  • Sluttxoxx
    **** X (@Sluttxoxx) reported

    @lily_lna @PostOffice I mean that you seem more dressed for a cocktail party than popping down the Post Office, but itโ€™s certainly not immodest!

  • TwitchObsydiak
    Obsydiak (@TwitchObsydiak) reported

    @lily_lna @PostOffice I'll take "**** that never happened but we'll pretend did for attention because I likely did something stupid, got told off for it and am now a salty Karen"....for 3 please Bob

  • SteveC080624
    Steve ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟ (@SteveC080624) reported

    @lily_lna @PostOffice Backless, but hardly immoral. Jealousy is a terrible thing.

  • Rubio43210
    ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Rubio - Suffrage 2.0 ๐Ÿ’š๐Ÿค๐Ÿ’œ (@Rubio43210) reported

    @lily_lna @PostOffice As an employee itโ€™s inappropriate. If you were wearing shorts & vest top I would view that as inappropriate too. However, as a customer itโ€™s entirely different, itโ€™s a lovely dress. Did she just target women? In France going bare chested into a shop is banned for men. Rightly so

  • origtxtigress
    theoriginaltexastigress =^..^= (@origtxtigress) reported

    @lily_lna @PostOffice People, she was a customer, not an employee. Personally, I would not have worn something like that to run errands, but hat's just me. Maybe she was on the way to an engagement where the dress was appropriate.

  • gwynedd8364
    Chris Green (@gwynedd8364) reported

    @aet4040 @lily_lna @PostOffice 1. It didn't happen. 2. I know she was a customer.

  • JS02Hyd
    JSR ๐Ÿ›• ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ โš” (@JS02Hyd) reported

    @NCMIndiaa NonStop corruption for โ‚น500-โ‚น3000 Why not hav a robust procedure. Recommended: HOME verification,done by @IndiaPostOffice for โ‚น100-200 fee PostOffice NOC online& T+1 day Police commissioner NOC to MEA MEA prints passport,T+2 + Post issue,Verify Annual

  • Ynotynot1957
    Tony H ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง (@Ynotynot1957) reported

    @JackieMayes5 @lily_lna @PostOffice Nah, just looks stupid