Sky outages and service status in Low Coniscliffe, England
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Full Outage Map
- Sky generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Low Coniscliffe, including 0 direct reports.
- The most common problems reported in this area mention Internet and TV.
- Internet (86%)
- TV (14%)
Sky offers satellite television service as well as broadband internet and home phone service. Sky also operates a pay-TV service, including the Sky Sports channel which broadcasts Premier League games, which are also availble on the Sky Go video streaming service.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Low Coniscliffe, England
The chart below shows the number of Sky reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Low Coniscliffe, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Sky. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Live Outage Map Near Low Coniscliffe, England
The most recent Sky outage reports came from the following cities: Darlington, Newton Aycliffe, and Stockton-on-Tees.
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
 Darlington
|
Internet | 9 days ago |
|
Newton Aycliffe
|
Internet | 10 days ago |
|
Newton Aycliffe
|
Internet | 12 days ago |
|
Newton Aycliffe
|
Internet | 12 days ago |
|
Newton Aycliffe
|
TV | 13 days ago |
|
Stockton-on-Tees
|
Internet | 15 days ago |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Sky Issues Reports Near Low Coniscliffe, England
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Low Coniscliffe and nearby locations:
-
Bradley (@lister2k11) reported from Darlington, EnglandAccount getting locked due to copyright .. **** off @SkySports
-
Donone (@BaldTiredGrumpy) reported from Stockton-on-Tees, England@SkyHelpTeam hi I'm trying to contact the help team. I've got sky q and am trying to activate discovery +. I have an old account which isn't active and think this account is stopping me activating discovery. Can someone contact me please?
-
-
dean croft (@deano_croft) reported from Ingleby Barwick, EnglandHi @SkyHelpTeam I get an error message ‘please insert your viewing card with the chip facing up’. The card is in and I have taken it out and put it back in and turned it off and on at the plug as advised - please help
-
Gingerninja (@Monsieur_Ginger) reported from Hunwick, England@SkyHelpTeam You have once again failed to support or help me! .
-
Paul Haggie (@ha66ie) reported from Stockton-on-Tees, England@SkyHelpTeam I'm trying to get discovery plus on the offer but no matter what I do I cannot get past this stupid screen. Details are correct. Total joke.
-
Gary Philipson (@GaryAPhilipson) reported from Sedgefield, England@SkyHelpTeam Can you send an engineer to find out why ( everyday) the main Q box loses signal? Seriously every day! It’s taken 3 hours to get this to reconnect. Surely that’s unacceptable ?
-
will (@WJB2201) reported from Ingleby Barwick, England@SkySports She wanted the league cancelling last season cos you thought you’d go down. Silly cow
-
David Ivo Iveson (@the_real_ivo) reported from Bishop Auckland, England@SkySports Should have give him a testimonial for his service to the club
-
Jimmy Lees (@jimmylees) reported from Egglescliffe, EnglandJust spent over 30 minutes trying to get through to @SkyUK about my TV services not working. They didn’t answer. Terrible customer service.
-
Chris (@CJXXXXW) reported from Darlington, EnglandWow @SkyHelpTeam a £5 increase from my next bill that’s harsh maybe time to cancel when out of contract!
-
Dan Donnelly (@dandinnerlady) reported from Stockton-on-Tees, England@SkyHelpTeam No use ... I am trying to work from home .. the poor quality of your service is costing me money and A LOT of time
-
Lennon Campbell (@CampbellLennon) reported from Coundon, England@amo_a_los_Leeds @TC38534491 @rgardom1 @SkySports So they can use the “you only care about it because your teams doing well” argument against you they’ll never admit that voiding a season is actually in their own interests because they’d have no argument. The fact they all support the same teams is no coincidence
-
Marcus (@MarcusSummers81) reported from Stockton-on-Tees, England@SkyHelpTeam Hi, I'm still struggling to understand how to speak to someone about my account, my future bills are astronomical and I don't want to pay the figures quoted. I'd like to negotiate a deal with someone please, can you help?
-
David 'Ivo' Iveson (@the_real_ivo) reported from Bishop Auckland, England@LucieCook89 @SkyUK @SkyHelpTeam It's never by a fiver though!
-
dean croft (@deano_croft) reported from Ingleby Barwick, EnglandMatch choice on red button not working @SkySports 🙄
-
Mark McAneny (@MarkMcAneny) reported from Stockton-on-Tees, England@Nicosrn1 @SkyUK @SkyHelpTeam Add me to this complaint. Ordered gold Pro on the 16th. Before 3pm. Still no news. Shocking customer service !!!
-
Dave Fraser (@FraserFixit) reported from Darlington, England@SkySportsF1 the workday advert on SkyGo is causing audio sync issues. The advert plays when you put the channel on but the program starts. When the ad finishes the audio from the program starts late. Please remove the ad/fix the app. This is horrible to watch! @skytv @SkySports
-
Mike Charlston (@mikecharlston) reported from Witton-le-Wear, England@SkyHelpTeam That it would still be affected by the trees. Currently the line of sight in its current location hits the very centre / bulk of the tree. The location I suggested I think at worst would clip some lower branches. I think if mounted low enough it would not hit the tree at all.
-
Richard Sutton (@rich_sutt) reported from Darlington, England@SkyHelpTeam Hi guys we were just looking at our sky account and noticed we have had an increase of £36 pound a month since June. Surely this can't be fair especially to a long standing customer. The words **** Turpin springs to mind.
Sky Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
CfcNav (@nav_cfc) reported@90_JoshB Struggling to understand how people have missed your point or they're just playing dumb. People tune in to TNT/Amazon/SkySports etc for unbiased commentary for the UCL, completely different to an international match commentary by a network where the B (in BBC) stands for British
-
Jonno (@therealbigjonno) reported@SkySports That’ll go down well in Catalonia.
-
JB🇺🇸 (@19Defender86) reportedApple’s @F1 feed is atrocious. I swear it’s made me lose interest in F1 this season. The on-screen talent is lacking. Just not polished and they look like they are reject journos from Paris fashion week. @SkySports feed is ace. Too bad you can’t do replays in the US #Monaco
-
Bren Connolly 🇺🇦 (@BlueBren) reported@PED7 Football is dull now, full stop. Teams are obsessed with not making a mistake and take so few risks, there’s no excitement. And finals are the worst of the lot. I’ve got SkySports and TNT, but if it wasn’t for my love of the Blues I probably wouldn’t watch the game at all.
-
puro sazón (@spcghstt) reported@juvenewslive @SkySports wtf is their problem
-
@ (@vella_vision) reported@SkyFootball @SkySports A bad omen
-
Tubosun Falowo (@precinoti) reportedVAR RECCURING ERRORS: “WHO IS AT FAULT? THE TECHNOLOGY OR PGMOL OFFICIALS?”. I think to unpack this debacle that we have come to normalized as natural occurrence similar to daily human mistakes, errors by PGMOL officials as seen in almost all game week in the EPL, VAR is simply defined as “Video Assisted Referee”. To break this further, it is officiating a football match using technology i.e video replays, images etc to spot obvious and clear errors committed by the on-field human officials usually 4 personnel or actions sanctioned by the rules as fouls that were completely missed by the on-field officials. For VAR to be effective and not seen as in direct conflict or undermining the authorities of the on-field referees, certain parameters of the game state were defined as areas VAR can intervene like DOGSCO, dangerous play, incidents in the penalty box, violent conducts by players and these activities were categorized into 4 major areas i.e goals (and the attacking phase leading to them), penalties (awarded or missed), direct red cards, and mistaken identity. Now that we have defined VAR and clarified the intended use of VAR, how is it possible that a technology deployed to spot clear and obvious errors made by on-field officials somehow end up with recurring errors that lead to controversies, major talking points post-match every week and in most cases deciding the outcome of football matches? I am Arsenal fan so let’s use Arsenal specific VAR incidents as an example. 3 seasons ago at Newcastle, 3 separate incidents and VAR were unable to spot any. One of the incidents was if the ball had crossed the line. Subjective as at that time because VAR had no camera at the corner flag and no spider camera to confirm if the entire ball had crossed the line. Fast track to this season and at Nottingham Forest, a defender clearly used his hand to control the ball from going into corner kick. There was a camera at the corner, and we all saw that deliberate handball. Juxtaposing both incidents, VAR error at Newcastle had been effectively addressed with a camera at the corner at Nottingham Forest but yet outcome was the same. Arsenal this season at Brighton, Arsenal player deliberately holding a Brighton player in the box during an attacking play missed by the referee but no VAR intervention. At Mancity, an Arsenal player engaging in a violent act but was issued a yellow card instead of a red card. Both actions had no VAR error but officials’ wrong interpretation of the Rules and wrong decision. Typically, most OEMs and other manufacturers usually issue a warning and a recall of their products once that notice significant factory defect or recurring manufacturing errors to their products and such products are withdrawn within weeks, months or sometimes within a year. Before doing this, the OEM go through a process of investigation to determine the root cause, issue a notice to their customers and users and proceed to a remedy phase where repairs and replacements are undertaken. The question now is if VAR (technology) is the problem, who are the OEM of EPL VAR and why have no one asked the OEM to undertake this process of stopping this recurring errors? How come none of the media platforms in the UK ever done any kind of hit piece, editorial or investigative journalism on the recurring errors of the technology? Rather, we have an independent panel that review VAR errors, we have a Skysports PGMOL show where the Head of PGMOL do a review of the VAR errors weekly as well as other controversial officiating decisions, we have another Skysports show where ex-referee do a review of VAR good or bad calls, Talksports have similar radio shows, Ex-Referees have podcasts and Youtube Channels talking about VAR errors and we have media platforms doing annual reports like the one done by BBC, The Athletic and now ESPN doing VAR errors and impact on clubs, title races and relegation battles.
-
Tony Masud / Uncle Montana (@tonymasud) reported@ChelseaShurrle Skysports ripping off South Stand comms? Damn, that’s embarrassing
-
Olive Blagborough (@Fisher45415R) reported@VRoonaldo @SkySports It’s a city internal interview you stupid **** .
-
macca1B (@IanMacdonald5) reported@SkySportsNews @SkySports Somebody’s getting fired in their recruitment department he’s never a barcelona player.